I kind of like FS9's 100% AI traffic stil accaptable frame rate power(when using add-on traffic of course) and the room it has to run the big expansions. However. With 'just' UT USA and flying the same Real Air aircraft the end result is pretty close. IMOhttp://forums.avsim.net/user_files/173683.jpg

I've got it all figured out! :)When I want 100% traffic, and all the extra stuff, I switch to FS9.When I want to fly around my hometown mountain area, with improved high resolution graphics, and a much better look of mountain depth, as I peer over the wing; I just use FSX!L.Adamson