November 25, 200718 yr I recently took a flight down the east coast of Australia from Hamilton Island(YBHI) to Brisbane(YBBN) and noticed that on 2 or 3 occasions, when slightly off the coast, I got Oceanic UHF chatter. As this is not realistic (losing the centre controller chatter when only 5 - 10 nm offshore) is there some way to change this or would this be classed as a "future request"? Mitchell Ward ____________________________________________________ Q9550 (@3.8), 9800GTX, 4G DDR2 1066, W7RC FSX/Acceleration/REX textures/REX weather/MyTrafficX/RC4.3
November 26, 200718 yr Commercial Member what version of rc are you running. i thought that was fixedjd JD Read my blog
November 26, 200718 yr Author FSX V4.3.3845 Mitchell Ward ____________________________________________________ Q9550 (@3.8), 9800GTX, 4G DDR2 1066, W7RC FSX/Acceleration/REX textures/REX weather/MyTrafficX/RC4.3
November 26, 200718 yr Commercial Member hmmi guess the oceanic control zone is positioned that close to land. have you seen this happen anywhere else?jd JD Read my blog
November 26, 200718 yr Author >hmm>>i guess the oceanic control zone is positioned that close to>land. have you seen this happen anywhere else?>>jdNo I haven't. I'll check it out some more. Mitchell Ward ____________________________________________________ Q9550 (@3.8), 9800GTX, 4G DDR2 1066, W7RC FSX/Acceleration/REX textures/REX weather/MyTrafficX/RC4.3
November 27, 200718 yr This is probably normal as along the east coast of Australia OCA begins not too far off the coast (but 10nm...hmmm maybe cutting it a little close). The radar environment still exsists around the major centers like Brisbane and Sydney and consists of a 150 to 200nm arc around those cities towards the ocean. Elsewhere along the coast, the OCA boundary is a lot closer to shore.RC doesn't have the all airspace information to infinate detail of course, but makes a very good resprentation of what is really there. Sort of like the terrain mesh that we see in FS - even at LOD11 terrain sampling, it is "accurate" but not "exactly" the same as the r/w.Btw, in the subject line, it should be Oceanic HF, not UHF ;-)Subs
Create an account or sign in to comment