Hannes44

I'm trying to install the JeeHell A320 cockpit software. I have a problem understanding the offsets JeeHell implements. There are first a lot of read offsets 1Byte long i.e. 8 Bits , no problem,but then there are offsets from 78E8 up they are also 1 Byte long and they can have values from 0 to 77.That obviously can't be bits to set, but it doesn't make much sense to me to write one value after the other to the same offset, with the most different functions to one offset like e.g. all of the lighting switches. Help would be appriciated!

Without any obvious reason it is suddenly impossible to set NAV and COM frequencies. I can tune in in the standby window, transfer the new value to the active window but after about a second the value in the active window turns automatically back to the default value 118.000 for COM and 108.00 for NAV. This happens with all installed planes Microsoft default and third-party addons. I thought of corrupt radio gauge files, installed the original ones, no luck. As I usually start up cold and dark I thought of the avionics switch not switched on, so I created a flight with the Cessna cold and dark saved it as default flight, shut FS9 down, started up again - same problem with all planes. I have no clue, help is very much appreciated.

I want to use a beamer or projector with my home cockpit. Now I have got an older Acer beamer with a native resolution of 800x600. With 3D Objects and AI planes I get terrible anti-aliasing problems. Even with Nhancer running anti-aliasing on the highest level there are ugliest steps with 3D objects. Is there a way to avoid these "jaggies" or do I have to live with them. Flying is not to bad without any objects present, but landing and looking at runways from afar or buildings or other aircraft is anexperience I could do without. Is there a better solution for projecting the scenery? What do you use?

+39

As scenery guru Oliver Pabst wrote in an Aerosoft forum Slovenia-Croatia scenery has a problem with LC files. Maybe deactivating LC and WC could help!

Sorry to answer so belated. I had the same problem with LIRF. If you haven't found the culprit until now I remember it was one of the MRAI scenery excludes from a MRAI scenery in Italy or Spain.

Got it. Thanks a lot for very fast response.

I received the registry key with e-mail but the key doesn't work. I copied it into the register-screen clicked the button and the register screen vanished without any comment or failure-message.After restarting RC the register screen asked again for the key. I read in another post that there might be a problem with the minus sign in the ID number I have not included this in the second mail I wrote to the register-bot because with my first try (when I included the - sign) I received a mail that the bot wouldn't be able to process the request because there were alpha signs in the ID string. Please help I'm eager to getting started!!

Hi!Thanks for the reply but I was not between weather stations I was right on top of Vienna airport. I know about the CAVOK situation ... I don't think it was CAVOK. I shall test fly again tomorrow.

all around me flying with FS9 and Active Sky 6.5 when the report says Clouds:None. Precipitation:None and a look out of the window convinces me that the report is correct: sky is blue, not one cloud anywhere.

Thanks for the response.User plane response is checked but as I said it doesn't seem to work because user plane seems to be ignored.I have speech accelerated cause ATC is really slow.What about Radar Contact or other ATC programs?

I have installed a lot of AI traffic and I love it. But the FS2004-ATC is totally insufficient to handle all this traffic especially on approach. I have tried AIsmooth, but this program ignores my plane completely and holds only AI planes when there are difficulties. Question: Is there a more sophisticated ATC program that can handle holds etc and avoid crashes between AI planes and my plane in dense approaches? Radar Contact? Vox ATC?

Thanks for all replies. After assurance that it could be done, I found the solution for my system: FSX didn't change the video card entrance in the FSX.cfg according to my selection in the properties window even though the correct possibilities to choose from were given. After I did this manually I am able to use the monitors on the other video card with triple Head2Go too but I must say I get depressingly low FPS in comparison with FS9 when I use the full possibilites of FSX and I even did mot install one of my myriads of AI planes. When I reduce textur-size and pull a lot of sliders more to the left I get between 20-30 FPS but then FS9 is a lot more beautiful to look at and there I've got maximum AI traffic and Utlimate Europe and and and.... I think FSX has to wait on the shelves with my software-collection for some years for a better computer to be affordable and I'll stay with FS9.x(

I have FS9 installed on a ADM Dual Core with two Graphic cards. One serves a Matrox triple Head2Go with 3 Monitors for display of the scenery, the second displays the 2D panel on a third monitor. In FS9 it's easy to distribute the windows to the respective monitors but with FSX I can't separate the display windows and everything has to stay on one monitor. Is there a solution for this admittedly rare problem?

My FS9 installation loses the internetconnection via LAN for real weather after 15 to 20 minutes of flight. The whole connection stays cossupt even after shutting down FS9.Help appreciated!Sorry for posting the same question I posted in the General Discussion Forum but I got no answer there.