Timeerror

Keeping the plane on the centerline in crosswind situations after landing is sometimes not possible for me.Francesco: How do you perform such wonderful roll outs.

Ok,thank you for your quick answersI think that I did this slipping/crabbing etc correct and the rollout seems do be more difficult than I thought.Is differential thrust "realistic".Whats about diffential braking?

Sorry, no idea. I only play hires.But this does not look nice

Hi,Maybe this is a silly question, but I am not a profi.How do you perform crosswind landings (manual). I tried to land in LOWI (Innsbruck) on runway 08 in a crosswind situation. Wind speed was 20 from the left. Touchdown was "ok" but the roll out was not good. I was not able to stay in the middle of the runway. So my question is:Is this a limitation of FSX?What are your techniques for cross wind landings

Hi,I just would like to say "thank you" for the 4:3 panel and SP1. The new panel is great and I am happy. You did a great job.Markus

Hi, thank you for your clear answer. I know, that my descent style is ... unusal, but I was just wondering, whether this is possible. But thank you for your clear answer

Ok, thats very sad to hear, that a 4:3 panel is not planed. Now one question: I think that a widescreen monitor has an impact on the framerate, because of the resolution. What is your experience? Markus

Hi, Yes, I am one of these people that come out and ask for a 4:3 panel. O.k. The MD-11 was a perfect product. The MD-11 has/had a perfect VC and 2D panels for 4:3 and widescreen monitors and so on... It was a perfect service from PMDG. And now I am missing this service. In my opinion, a perfect addon should have features like 4:3 and widescreen panels, a fuel planner, etc.An I am not the only one, who is interested in a 4:3 panel. I am also not very happy, if - in future - a 2D panel will not be included in PMDG products, but this is another issue.However an official statement from PMDG would be nice. Markus

Hi, of course, the VC looks nice on a 4:3 monitor. Why not?.I also know, that some of us are happy with the 2D panel on their 4:3 monitor.I do not want to be unpolite. My question was not, whether 4:3 panel are good or bad etc.I would only like to know, whether PMDG will forward us a 4:3 panel with SP1 or not; and if not why...Thats all.I know, that 4:3 monitors are not "up to date", but that was not the question or the issue of this topic (sorry).

Hi, I noticed, that we will not get more 2D panels with SP1. Does this mean, that we will not get a 4:3 panel version?I hope that this is not case. Is forwarding a 4:3 panel so difficult? Markus

Has nobody an idea?

Hi, thats a good question. I also tried to create such a waypoint. I would be very interested, how such waypoints could be created. Markus

Thank you for your answer. The problem is not the way how to enter custom waypoints in the Leg page. The problem is a manual waypoint entry on the decent page. This is different issue. But thank you for your answer. Markus

Hi, I have a short question: For planing my descent I am used to load a waypoint manualy 40nm away from the aiport/rwy with the following constraints: 240/10000. In general I would like to descent to this waypoint with a descent rate of 1500v/s. To do this, I am used to load this waypoint on the decent page (I thinK: R3). When the v/s rate shows 1500, I initiate the descent. However, during cruise it is not possible for me to load a waypoint manualy on the NGX. The question is why? Thank you for your answers. Markus

Hi, it is interesting to know, that I could do that on my own. Please provide us with more detailed information. If everybody could do that on his/her own, we would not need a 4:3 panel. What should we change, to get a 4:3 panel??? Thanks for your reply