yuris125

Hi Nico, I just encountered the teleport problem with P3Dv5 HF2 and PSXT 18.6. Log below ("Flight not running / Flight resuming" events at 10:42 is when the teleport happened) Notes: I have flown 35 hours with 18.6 until this point without running into this issue, it is quite rare This happened when an AI aircraft using an old AI Aardvark 767 model spawned - I replaced most 767s with FAIB model, but a few stray AIA ones remain. Wonder if it's relevant Best Yuri *************************************** liveries summary *************************************** 5922 liveries read from file "F:\FS\AILGenerator\liveries\AI_liveries.xml", of which 37 specials author: AILGenerator, version: 6.1, date: Mar 16, 2020 Reg VQ-BRD for "FAIB Airbus A320 CFM S7 Siberia Airlines", already exists for FAIB Airbus A321 IAE Nordwind Airlines oc 20929 registration codes found in the liveries of the user generic Boeing liveries for 11 types: B732 B737 B738 B739 B748 B762 B763 B764 B788 B789 B78X generic Airbus liveries for 8 types: A318 A332 A339 A342 A343 A359 A35K A388 no generic Embraer liveries generic Bombardier liveries for 2 types: BCS1 BCS3 no generic ATR liveries generic Private liveries for 39 types: A310 A318 A319 A320 AN28 AT75 B190 B737 B763 BE20 BE9L C130 C208 C402 C421 C525 C550 C56X CL30 CL35 CL60 CRJ7 DH8A DH8C DHC6 E120 E35L GL5T GLEX GLF3 GLF4 GLF5 H25B J328 LJ25 LJ35 LJ45 LJ60 SW4 781 unique airlines, 149 unique aircraft types Default livery set for aircraft category Heavy, type B763, # liveries: 173 Default livery set for aircraft category Middle, type A320, # liveries: 664 Default livery set for aircraft category Light, type C402, # liveries: 201 No default livery found for aircraft category Heli ************************************************************************************************ 12625 registration codes added from "data\regcodes.xml" author: AILGenerator, version: 5.1, date: Sep 14, 2019 User aircraft title: Aerosoft A321 professional BRITISH AIRWA User aircraft model: A321IAE User aircraft wing span unknown, max is taken instead, please report in my Forum! Connecting QNHReader to UDP port 49004 ... QNHReader connected Connecting TrafficReader to UDP port 49003 ... TrafficReader connected QNH=1008 User on the ground at airport WSSS, standing still The parking airport is: WSSS (SIN) Out of business information read from "data\outofbusiness.xml" author: Nico, version: 3.1, date: July 17, 2020 ===> Counted # real live options 44 differs from value 45 in the file, corrected ===> Counted # real live parking positions 39 differs from value 45 in the file, corrected Parkpos file "parked_updates\WSSS.xml" for Changi author: ParkPosGenerator, version: 17.1, date: Aug 31, 2020 supplier: 182 parking positions, of which 39 real live parking positions (21%), of which 34 soft positions, with 44 live options last update: Sep 5, 2020 09:48:59 There are 53 parking positions with an option at 10:00 (utc) +/- 12 hours Only 53 positions to be filled No parking at np400, no livery match for CPA B748 SIA232 9V-SMF SYD ->SIN A359 =r= FSPainter Airbus A350-900 Singapore Airlines UBG372 S2-AJD SIN ->DAC B738 =g= FAIB Boeing 737-800 Boeing House Livery LNI229 PK-LGW BTH ->PDG B739 =r= FAIB Boeing B737-900w Lion Air JSA765 9V-JSU SIN ->MNL A320 === FAIB Airbus A320-200SL IAE Jetstar Asia NNC2 HKC372 B-LNX SIN ->HKG A332 =g= TFS Airbus A330-200 RR 'Prototype' SIA7951 9V-SFM BOM ->SIN B744 =r= FAIB Boeing 747-400F PW Singapore Airlines Cargo SIA964 9V-SMK SIN ->CGK A359 =r= FSPainter Airbus A350-900 Singapore Airlines THY056 TC-LNE IST ->CGK A333 =r= TFS Airbus A330-300 GE Turkish Airlines CTV925 PK-GQH KNO ->BTH A320 === FAIB Airbus A320-200 IAE Citilink PK-GLG CTV956 PK-GQU BTH ->PDG A320 === FAIB Airbus A320-200 IAE Citilink PK-GLC 'Kapal Api'Logojet FY1346 9M-FYK SZB ->JHB AT75 === ATR-72-600 FlyFirefly SIA226 9V-SCH PER ->SIN B78X =r= UTT Boeing 787-10 Singapore Airlines GIA157 PK-GFP BTH ->CGK B738 === FAIB Boeing 737-800w Garuda Indonesia Short Nozzle Sky Interior Sticker 09:53:22 Live: 12, Parked: 51 KMI801 HS-KMA CGK ->SIN B734 =x= FAIB Boeing 737-400 JAL Express 09:58:15 Live: 9, Parked: 51 CPA716 B-LBC SIN ->HKG A333 =r= TFS Airbus A330-300 RR Cathay Pacific 10:03:09 Live: 7, Parked: 50 10:08:21 Live: 4, Parked: 52 CTV944 PK-GTD CGK ->BTH A20N =s= FAIB Airbus A320-200SL IAE Citilink PK-GLY BTK6862 PK-LZH CGK ->BTH A320 =x= FAIB Airbus A320 CFM Lufthansa nc 10:13:20 Live: 5, Parked: 52 AXM6422 9M-RAT JHB ->PEN A320 === FAIB Airbus A320 CFM AirAsia 'AirAsia Mobile App' SIA877 9V-SCG TPE ->SIN B78X =r= UTT Boeing 787-10 Singapore Airlines SIA861 9V-SHL HKG ->SIN A359 === FSPainter Airbus A350-900 Singapore Airlines 10:18:14 WSSS is at 5.1 nm, parked aircraft removed 10:18:14 No more parking at WSSS (SIN) 10:18:14 "parked_updates\WSSS.xml" saved and sorted 10:18:21 Live: 8, Parked: 0 QNH=1010 10:23:22 Live: 6, Parked: 0 ASY621 A41-206 C17 =x= MAIW_PAI_C17A_RCH_58_94-0065 9M-RAH 9M-RAH KUL ->JHB A20N =r= FAIB Airbus A320neo CFM AirAsia 10:28:19 Live: 7, Parked: 0 10:33:15 Live: 5, Parked: 0 10:38:18 Live: 1, Parked: 0 QNH=1009 QNH=1007 ANG392 P2-PXV POM ->SIN B763 =r= AI Aardvark Boeing 767-300 GE Air Niugini 10:42:41 Flight not running ... 10:42:42 Flight resumed QNH=1009 10:43:26 Live: 1, Parked: 0 10:48:19 Live: 1, Parked: 0 LNI275 PK-LPJ SRG ->BTH B738 === AI B738W LNI QNH=1007 10:52:34 Live: 2, Parked: 0 10:58:19 Live: 0, Parked: 0 No Traffic? No Traffic? No Traffic? 11:00:13 Live: 0, Parked: 0 No Traffic? No Traffic?

Thanks Nico! Yes, version 5.4 worked in FSX for me, the main window was saying "connecting" for FS status throughout the flight, but traffic was injected anyway Definitely interested in joining the group, sending PM in a moment Agree my suggestion is not critical, "nice to have" is a right priority for it

Hi Nico, First of all, many thanks for your work producing this amazing piece of software! I've done three flights so far and thoroughly enjoyed it There's one issue I wanted to bring up. Full disclosure: I use FSX. I'm aware it's not supported, and if it's an FSX-specific problem which doesn't occur on P3D, just ignore me The issue is that I have difficulty finding a gap on approach into a busy airport (e.g. Heathrow). Aircraft are spaced very tightly on final approach in real world, and PSXseeconTraffic accurately depicts it, making it next to impossible to join the approach - unless the user is willing to ignore TCAS alerts and land on occupied runway if need be. I expect it to be an even bigger issue in airports which don't have a dedicated runway for landing, such as Gatwick What I would like to see - don't know if it would be difficult to implement, just thinking aloud about a possible solution - is for there to be an option to suppress depiction of the aircraft closest to the user when he or she joins the approach. Perhaps the user should be informed about the callsign of the aircraft being suppressed, in the PSXseeconTraffic window or in the notification line in FS, whatever works better. They would then be able to follower the suppressed aircraft using RealTraffic radar and replicate whatever it's doing, thus basically taking place of this aircraft in the traffic flow A similar problem can happen on the ground as well - departures out of Heathrow are also spaced tightly, and finding a gap can be an issue Hope this doesn't sound too convoluted and silly. Many thanks once again for your fantastic work! Best Yuri

Hi jd,I think I know a way to have this feature implemented to everyone's satisfaction* As soon as RC can read arrival's weather, it should do so. Preferably it should happen before TOD, so about 200 nm out* If visibility at the airport is below a specified value (this may or may not be configurable), RC informs the captain about the current visibility, and presents a choice to proceed with the planned arrival, or divert to one of the alternates* In a perfect world, it should also be possible to check weather for each alternate before making the decision, but I don't know if it's possible* If visibility is below a specified value, visual approach option should not be available (or visual approach requests should be denied)This scenario would allow those who want to approach on ILS and auto-land to do so regardless of weather, and those who want to approach visually not to spend time trying to do so when it's impossible. As far as I know, it's also close enough to real-world procedures (although I'm not an expert here)As for declining take-off requests, I don't think it would be reasonable to have them: if a user started FS and loaded RC, he would be very frustrated not to get a take-off clearance. This might also be included as an information, provided by clearance delivery or ground, about airport visibility, and a suggestion not to take-off. But in any case, the user should make this decisionI think it would be nice to have this feature implemented, if possibleThanksYuri

Thanks for explaining! Yes, I noticed I rarely have a conflict with an AI plane when flying with RC (and I almost never fly with it :) ). So I'll ignore TCAS warnings, knowing that RC will take care of potential conflicts :)

Hi,Probably a stupid question, but still... :) What's the correct reaction to traffic advisories? For example, there's an AI plane on the reciprocal course, RC issues an advisory when it's 13-15 nm away from me, I check my TCAS and see that a risk of collision is present. What should I do next? Request higher/lower from RC, climb/descend to avoid a collision without telling RC, turn left/right to avoid collision? If I should request higher/lower, what should I do if RC denies the request? It will probably clear us in 2 minutes, but when there are 13 nm between the planes, we can't wait 2 minutes :)ThanksYuri

Hi,Don't know if it helps, but I had a similar problem with the push/pull knob on PMDG 737-800. When I pressed the knob to switch to standard pressure, altimeter didn't show correct altitude. I use FlightSim Commander, and its GPS window also showed altitude different from the plane's altimeter. So now I set the pressure manually every time, and the problem doesn't appear. This may be not the best solution, but at least it works :)CheersYuri

Hi,Sorry for posting this so late, it happened so that I started to use RC only about a week agoHope there is a chance to submit some callsigns for addition yetI didn't see one of the biggest Russian airlines in the list, did I miss it? If it indeed isn't there, could it be added please?Transaero AirlinesCallsign (as far as I know): Transoviethttp://www.transaero.ruAlso we have a small but very active low-cost carrier, it would be great if it could be added tooSkyExpressCallsign: Skystormhttp://www.skyexpress.ruLike many others, I can't imagine flying without Radar Contact anymore, and I'd like to thank you very much for your outstanding programBest regardsYuri