level7
-
Content Count
416 -
Donations
$0.00 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by level7
-
-
I was wondering since many people here use Ultimate Terrain, do they find it particularly useful for tubeliner flying? I would assume at high flight levels that where exactly rivers / roads are would not be as important?I already have REX and GEP and am interested in UT Europe.
-
i dug up this post by ryan from PMDG about the JS41 and the MD-11. their don't seem to have "suffered" like you said by going the FSX route.If a company develops only what they want to develop, then they will be out of business so fast their heads will spin. PMDG made the JS41 for them, and their sales on it suffered. Why? Because who in their right mind is going to buy something that they have no interest in. I hate Smarte Cars. You wouldn't catch me dead in one. I sure as heck wouldn't throw away $20,000.00 on one. But with your logic, you are saying that I should buy it anyways because it's what Mercedes wants to make.
http://forums1.avsim.net/index.php?showtop...t&p=1672029Regarding your assertions about the MD-11 and J41, explain to me then why the FSX MD-11 outsold the FS9 one by a 3 to 1 margin and explain to me why we saw torrents that had something like 20,000 combined seeds and peers on them downloading the FS9 MD-11 just a day or two after release? Nothing even close to that number of pirates existed as far as the FSX version is concerned. The J41 is now our best selling product since the original 747 in 2005 - there's no problem at all with sales on it. -
i'm not sure which patch you're looking for, but here is the updated download sitehttp://www.scenerysolutions.com/ut_downloads_FS9.html
-
most of the orbx videos are not made using the default planes.i'm running much more modest hardware than you and i'm getting 30 fps with ORBX scenery with add-on aircraft.if you're using orbx scenery, you should read their manuals which include their suggested optimal settings.Someone then states," not all of us have a intel Ti7". The funny thing is, even with a new Ti7 960 overclocked (with all tweaks I found on the net also) to 3.9hz, ssd hard drive and a 2gb 285 gtx My copy Fsx still is a side show (well down in the lower teens as far as fps goes) with descent addon scenery and aircraft.Take a look at say a company like orbx which makes excellent addon scenery. All of their videos use a default aircraft being used . The reason is because there is not way to even use their scenery maxed out at the present time with a addon aircraft. So if you can live with default aircraft fsx is the way to go.I have wasted money on addons for fsx that I can't even use so for that very reason I will not buy any more . -
the fix applies to the FSGenesis mesh add-on (not free) and is not a fix for default airports
-
awesome review alan, hope to see more reviews from you in the futuresimon
Ultimate Terrain for Airline Flying
in The FS2004 (FS9) Forum
Posted
rock on ... thanks for the quick replieslooks like UT is a must buy, just hope i won't get OOM errors :(