twilfert

I am using RealTurb v2 with MSFS flying the Fenix A320. I set MSFS turbulence settings to Low as advised by Fenix but I’m not sure about the appropriate RealTurb settings. Could please someone advise the most realistic settings within RealTurb v2 for the Fenix A320 within MSFS2020. Thank you so much. Kind regards, Tilo

Hi Bryan, actually, when I first Switch to full Screen mode and then open the main Panel, then it appears. It is also still there when I Switch back to no-full Screen and back to full Screen again. So, this was actually a good hint:) Thanks for helping so fast. Kind regards, Tilo

Hello, Since I am on p3d v3 the main panel disappears when I am in full screen mode. As soon as I deactivate the full screen mode, the panel appears again. Is there a possibility to have the main panel visible also in full screen mode? Kind regards, Tilo

@peppi1979: yes, this Card is DX11 and yes, you are right about the RAM:) I meant 8GB... Tilo

I agree with you that there is no point to compare systems at or higher than 20FPS with systems that are running with higher FPS numbers (e.g. 30 or 40FPS), since the human eye processes around 24 FPS and not more. However, to say that a P3D simulator running at 9FPS is as fluid as a FSX simulator at 30FPS is just neglecting Physics and if you really experience and compare both scenaries in reality (I personally doubt you did), you will agree. A FPS below 15FPS for sure is more like a slide show no matter whether in P3D or in FSX... PS: I personally moved back to FSX today after more than one week adjusting P3D settings downwards to the lowest possible levels and still flying with 10+FPS the B777 at busy airports which was not a favourable experience at all. At the same time, I have around 20FPS with FSX at the same airports and with reasonable settings. I know it is the fault of my system that only has an older Nvidia550 2GB DX11 graphics card, 8MB RAM and a slower i7 Quad processor and I don`t blame PMDG or P3D or anyone else. I just wanted to share that you do not have a better performance by default by just moving to P3D. You also really need to have up to date hardware to take advantage of the P3D technology... Kind regards, Tilo

Thanks all that contributed to this thread. That was all really great help, just amazing... Kind Regards, Tilo

Thanks so much. The A/T setting in the PMDG Setup menu was exactly the missing item. It works now:) Kind regards, Tilo

Hello, my question might sound a bit stupid but I could not find anything about this topic on the net. After already in take off mode, I tried to reject the take off by just pulling back the throttles at my joystick but the aircraft continued to accelerate for take off. What do I need to do to reject the take off? I would be very thankful if you could help me here. Thanks very much in advance. Tilo

Thanks all for the advice. I think I will install the trial version and see how it works for me. Kind regards, Tilo

Ah, and you can configure the co-pilot in a way, that he handles all communication? How can you interfere if you prefer to do so (e.g. ask for a Direct-To, for another flight level, for another approach or runway)? Do you need voice then for that? Kind regards, Tilo

Well, RC does not assign STARs and SIDs...

Hello, my question might seem a bit stupid but I do not own a win7 English version and VOX speech reqognition would not work with my machine. I am therefore asking whether it is also possible to use VOX ATC only with pressing buttons and not using voice. Thanks very much for any feedback. Kind regards, Tilo

Hmm, I am afraid this will not work. As far as I know, it is possible to increase the deviation tolerance but when RC thinks I did not pass the waypoint at all, it will start complaining.

Thank you both for your advice. I will check out VOX ATC to see how it works. Tilo

Hello, I m using my B777 with autocruise and maximum timecompression of x8. However, doing this and flying at x8, radard contact often does not recognize that I reached a waypoint and already heading to the next one. In consequence, it is telling me to turn 180 degrees to get back to this waypoint. The only way to solve that is to ask for a "direct to" the next waypoint to get rid of these messages. As this is quite annoying, I would like to ask whether there are other users that have the same issues and maybe found a workaround? Since Pro ATC X is also on the market, does someone have experience whether this issue exists with that software as well or is it worth trying Pro ATC X if there is no workaround with radar contact? Thank you for any advise. Kind regards, Tilo Sorry, if you see this topic three times but there have been an error message, that the site is not available. so I tried it three times :huh: Sorry about that... Tilo