peter197

Hey, So I think pretty much everyone has had this issue at least once. You get a brand new FSX plane and really want to fly it, and although you can get the basics of it, you just can't figure out the autopilot or a particular system. For me the Milviz F-15E is a problem as the autopilot confuses me, as does the weapon system. So maybe there should be a website in which you can book a session with a guy who knows how to fly the plane inside out, so you can chat with the guy and he can teach you everything you need to know about the plane. Thus in this way, people can learn how to fly well/better with that particular plane instead of trial and error. I think this could work very well, if we had lots of people involved, all very knowledgable about a particular plane. e.g. X- T-38, F-14, NGX, 767 Y- F-15, F-16, Su-27, AXE Z- Eurofighter, Sabre, 744, MD-11 However, I think that the people who were the instructors had to be very good with the plane and know more than the basics, have knowledge of emergency systems, and pretty much answer any question the trainee fired at him. Please reply if interested Pete

I was just interested whether rolling back some cores and pushing the main two would make a substantial difference. I get pretty good performance as it is, but even in fairly normal situations, Aerosoft sceneries just sit at 20FPS. I won't bother. I might try it though. Pete

For Computer Guys-I have an i7 3930k OC'ed to 4.5Ghz. Hex core, Hyperthreading disabled. I mainly use it for FSX, and FSX only really uses core 0 and 1. Would it be unstable if I disabled core 4 and 5, pushed core 2 and 3 back to say 3.8Ghz and superclocked core 0 and 1? Not sure how far I could OC the first two, but what do you think? Pete

For the guy who said about the su-27, there is the ALS-SIM su-27. Go to Flight 1, it is good.

How about the HS Trident and VC10. VC10 particularly. It is only honourable to do the vc10 since it is close to final retirement. The VC10 is an awesome performer can could oretty much fly from most airports, and you have to agree, it i a beautiful plane. For the Trident, well they thought it was capable of breaking the sound barrier!

Honest here. You should start a donation pool to get this running faster and have more on this. I would seriously pay to get this running because this could be susceptible to falling through half way through, so we need an incentive. I REALLY REALLY WANT 64bit fsx and DX11. Please if you are going to do this- Hyperthreading compatibility Hex core use(i7 3930k) SLI compatibility. Please don't lead my hopes to nothing. Thanks Pete

I think that CPU speed certainly helps.

MAybe CS are trying to get realistic operations and the problems faced by pilots. Just joking. The weird thing is I get 25FPS or more on my rig at 4.4Ghz quad. Pete

I think an FPS friendly 777 is impossible, but I guess we'll find out in due course. Hopefully it will, but who knows.

The CS 707 is great fun. Love it.

OK thanks.

Why do you think PMDG's 777 will have good FPS?

I have connected to quite a small monitor, so performance wise it is not too taxing

Fair enough. Seems my computer is happy with it.

Hey, Stupidly modified this file without making a backup. If anyone has a default one lying around, please can you provide? Thanks, Pete