kutyafal

Yes, I know of the available methods and understand that at the moment that's all there is. Just to explain the use-case better, I use LNM widget in MSFS in a small window in the corner of the screen to provide taxi information. In this small window the current label config is too much but when I switch to the main LNM window I'd like to see all details so if this quick switch can be added in the future it would be wonderful.

Hello, is it possible to hide all labels quickly on the map? I only want to see the flight plan line and my plane, no labels of any kind to declutter the map even when zoomed in. Is it possible?

Just a quick ? Is it possible to delete individual measurement lines? I have a lot of custom PBD waypoints plus some extra measurements and don't want to clear all from the map, just a few. I thought it was possible somehow, but I can't figure it out.

No worries, I understand. I'll just have to use the old-fashioned way to calculate my own TOD. 🙂

Hi Alex, like I said the scenario is such that I have a flight plan between two airports but along the way I have to descend to a LAT/LONG location let's say below 1000ft AGL to complete the task then continue onward to the destination airport. Since a user waypoint has no elevation info LNM doesn't give any TOD guidance to the user waypoint, only to the destination airport. I understand it is not doable now but maybe it could be added in the future? I know we want LNM to do everything but it ALMOST does everything and really is a great tool for such non-standard aviation tasks.

Hello, I'm wondering if there is a way to specify an altitude restriction for a user point and have the flightplan elevation profile respect it? I'm using LNM with NeoFly where I have to fly to some LAT/LONG coordinates and would like LNM give me a TOD to that user point based on elevation entered. This would also be useful for regular flightplan waypoints in some scenarios. The TOD calculations can be pretty accurate once the airplane profile has been finetuned and it would help a lot in these cases.

Sorry to bring this up again, has this been made available since your reply? I'd like to use Bing sat imagery for planning with NeoFly (that also uses Bing). Google sat imagery is too different (even if it's generally better)

I edited my post. Latest of everything and all is updated.

Was setting up an RNAV approach into SKBO to runway 32R RNAV-C using the STAR ATAN4S and I got the error "STAR rwy 32L not equal to approach rwy 32R. Normally I would be able to re-select the STAR and it would prompt me for the runway but not this time. If I delete the STAR and re-select it I don't get a prompt for the rwy. The STAR is marked as for both 32L and 32R runways. Nothing has changed in my configuration so I thought I'd report it. Forgot to say, latest AIRAC and latest version of LNM.

I have to say it again, if the big tech companies would have this kind of service life would be much better. 🙂 Yes, good to see you found a solution. That is all that is needed, a bit of contrast. Many thanks and looking forward to the implementation! It's amazing to see how much this software has evolved since the early days. Can't praise it enough!

For some reason I can't post image but here is a screenshot of how difficult it is to spot the check box for this option. The "Dark" theme makes it almost impossible to spot. Is that something that can be adjusted? https://imgur.com/a/ENdLkkG

In older versions the current aircraft position LAT/LONG used to be displayed in the "Aircraft" tab bottom section. It's no longer there. Has it been moved? Where can I see this without hovering over the icon?

Uff, you had a good point. Traffic Global was not using TCAS. It's being blocked by XPilot. So mistery solved. 🙂

Regarding the Ai display, it's X-Plane 11 and 12 both. Fetch Ai aircraft is enabled in the conn dialog and also set to be displayed. I'll test it also in MSFS to see if there is any difference. Like I said, boats do display, but not Ai planes. For the airport rendering here is LFPG, one of the worst examples. MSFS: XPlane 11: XPlane 12: The XP11 version is still usable but the XP12 version has very lines. If it's possible at all it would be great to implement the same shading as in the MSFS/P3D display for the XP versions.

One more point, I find the shading of the airport for XP12 very faint, the taxiways are hardly visible. It's better in XP11 and much better for MSFS 2020. What is the reason for this? Is there any settings I can change to help this?