AyserKalypzo

Ahh.. Even without the smug the sattelite imagery looks very bad.

Of course they know what the world looks like, but be serious. If you saw a big middle eastern/north African mountainious city with an arid dry landscape with white/sand colored houses, would you be able to see which city it is? Unless you know the topography of each big city in that part of the world is, it would be very hard to determine. I hope that the AI is smart enough to make a very accurate representation of its real life counterpart even if there's no sharp sattelite imagery available.

I understand that photogrammetry is shown because of the wow factor and for people who never played a flight sim, but for the advanced flight simmer it's more interesting right now to see what a big Asian city looks like, given the fact that we can be pretty sure that the western countries are covered good.

There's a difference between a good-looking representation and an accurate representation. Sao Paulo also looked good in the short amount of time we could see it but according to the Brazalian guy that flew over the place himself said that It wasn't an accurate representation of the city, just as there were people saying that London didn't feel like London, yet. Don't get me wrong. I'm very excited about the photogrammetry and the Azure AI combined with sharp sattelite imagery. we don't know how sharp that sattelite imagery will be and what it will look like in the Sim outside of the West

Nice find. This is a lot more then only the speculation. Good to hear that it looks good. Does he just say that it looks good or does the Sim also represent the place accurate? I don't think a French guy can tell. At least it's good to hear that its not worse then the west ito graphics. I though that this week in London people were only able to fly Renton, Naples and Courchevelle?

Unfortunately I don't have a pc with windows on it. So we can expect sharp sattelite imagery in China? Are those places as sharp as Europe's /US sattelite imagery? From what I can see on Google Earth (which I know isn't gonna be used) most of the sattelite imagery in South America/Africa and Asia on there are not as sharp as in the Western countries.

Is Azure AI capable to understand how tall a building should be? Canary wharf in London (non photogrammetry) wasn't there.

Seoul didn't look that blurry although new Guinea looked very blurry. How's Bing imagery in Asia compared to Europe/NA?

I don't want to be a game breaker but it feels necessary to say that in the videos that they showed us so far there's no non-Western cities at all (probably due to Bings sattelite imagery focus on the Western countries). Bad feeling about this. I think till so far we got over 1 hour of Ms 2020 footage since September and of all that time they only showed us 50 seconds+2/3 screenshots of places outside the west. One of the most important things for me will that even the most remote places on earth will have ok to good sattelite imagery. If America/European major cities have photogrammetry imagery while Africa and Asia look more like default Xplane this game is going to disappoint. Since theyre only showing certain parts of the world all the time im full of doubt. I'd like to see what places like Argentina/Amazones/Lagos/South africa/Russia and South East Asia look like. How is Bing sattelite imagery in those places

I'd like to know what Azure AI is capable of in asian/African/South american cities

People would like to see what cities/landscapes in Africa/South america/Asia look like in online mode. with high bandwidth

This way expectations will ruin the game. They have to show some areas where there isn't photogrammetry/very high resolution sattelite imagery

I would like to see how the places where you would expect the scenery not to be as good as in NA/parts of Europe. South america, Africa, China/Mongolia/Siberia and Places on high latitudes But would also be very interested in South East Asia. I hope that the WHOLE world will be nice to explore, and not just one or two continents. There's nothing more immersive then having a fully covered world to fly in after all. More important then having seasons for me.

So are all buildings going to be authentic? Since use Azure converts sattelite data of all parts of the world? Like there are no autogen placed buildings?

Are Are you able to see if there is autogen being used or if the buildings in that part of the video are made by using Bing combined with Azure?