Jump to content

kakihara123

Members
  • Content Count

    179
  • Donations

    $0.00 
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

144 Excellent

About kakihara123

  • Rank
    Member

Flight Sim Profile

  • Commercial Member
    No
  • Online Flight Organization Membership
    none
  • Virtual Airlines
    No

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. They wrote Flight Simulator, not flight simulation. Slight, but important difference.
  2. Yeah...no. I mean could be pretty cool. But since I own a 3080 I won't get a any of those cards. Prices are a joke. They could actually have trouble selling those, since the crypto market crashed hard too. Recently started 3d printing and painting and if I compare the value of additional tools and supplies to that....
  3. Because they all suck, plain and simple. FSHud has several drawbacks that might improve in the future, but make it unusable now. Every other Software can't control AI traffic and that is a deal breaker for me. Apart from that they are old and ugly and clunky... so no alternative really.
  4. I don't really care about the product but I find this part of the description amusing: "No need to go and look for birds; it will be the birds coming to look for you" I just imagine some Alfred Hitchcock like suicide birds dive bombing your plane as soon as you load into the sim with blood everywhere and destroyed windows. Maybe add some dramatic music on top?
  5. As far as I understand it DLSS gets trained before it gets implemented. I doubt anything we do will influence it. No idea if Microsoft can do much about how it works. They can give feedback to Nvidia for sure however and they can then improve it. I bet Nvidia is also very interested in the Data from a flightsim because that is way more complex then any game that used it yet. Apart form the blurry displays, trees seem to be pretty hard for it when they are far away, which doesn't surprise me at all.
  6. Tested a bit around with DLSS again. In the Milviz C310R the blurry displays are not a problem, because the GPS is still readable and the other gauges are fine. Trees have some artifacts from higher up. However I throttled my framerate to 24 in SteamVR before and now managed to increase that to 36, which is a lot smoother. Didn't go higher yet and I'm just doin a longer flight to see how it goes...but that is nice. Might even be worth the blurry displays in the Fenix. But no sure yet.
  7. Raytracing absolutely hammers your GPU. And with MSFS there is a huge potential for it to look insanely good... and to be really really hard on your GPU.
  8. TAA is definitely a lot sharper. It is not even close. I mean I wish it was better. Which plane did you use?
  9. Did you look under Anti Aliasing? I initiale looked for a separate option, since that is the way most games do it. DLSS was a gamechanger for my on Cyperpunk 2077, where it doubled my FPS. But the FPS tanked in the first place because of raytracing. So DLSS might still be somewhat worth it for that if they implement it. But the need to find a way to enhance the display sharpness while DLSS is enabled.
  10. The DLSS implementation is....not good. I got a 5800x and a 3080 with an Index and displays are much sharper with TAA even on quality with DLSS. It did not affect it that much on the C310 and I did not go in depth regarding FPS, but with thee Fenix DLSS is useless since it is always much more blurry. The one other thing that was important for me is the VR toolbar window fix. While it is improved, since the windows are bigger when opened, they still don't remember size and position and close every time you disable VR. So that is very half assed. The main issue is exactly as it was before.
  11. Afaik this suggestion has already been made somewhere on the official forums. Hat could explain it. But I would think they would explain that it is a duplicate request.
  12. Especially in VR. Half Life Alyx does it very well. You would think having only hands ruins immersion, but it is quite the opposite, since the janky arms are worse. I don't know who good hand tracking is supported, but I think about getting the Pimax Crystal that has it and that could be pretty cool combined with my warthog. Motion trackers on the body could also remove some of the jank of the body movement. A simple thing that could be done is starting from a parked plane in the hangar and loading in boxes of cargo yourself into the plane when using Onair or something like that. This could also influence the CG of the plane depending on how you load it all up. Or opening the doors with you hands and better animated passengers getting in and sitting down. Again, there are far more important things atm, but this could one day be done.
  13. Onair has a light version of that. If you want to use a new type of plane on one of the harder difficulties you need to do a short checkride. Some climbing, leveling off and then a slow 360 degree turn just above stall speed at altitude. It is actually not that easy. Many people want enhanced career modes.
×
×
  • Create New...