Joshua757

You're going to love the X-Plane 12 version of Flyjsim :)

I believe Milviz/ Blackbird are bringing the 737-200 to msfs albeit very slowly :/

Couldn't agree more!

All I'm trying to say is we need a 737 in MSFS. That's the link. I thought it was obvious. Plus I wanted to share a tutorial because I know a lot of simmers struggle with the plane. I still don't find your narrative physically possible that the video "ended" and only now works. That's not how streaming works. I didn't ever restart my stream and this is confirmed by the eager participants who attended. What you experienced was most likely buffering or something as you reached the live point. A simple refresh of the page would have cleared it. That's totally different from stopping the video. However, if you still want to stick to that strange narrative, be my guest :/ I'll be sure to be careful with my wording next time. Although I did imply I'm going to do it, I honestly didn't know some people would still find that an issue. Also thank you to the other fellow avsim members who have shared my enthusiasm and desire to having a 737-200 in MSFS2024 :)

Well, in all fairness I said in my OP 'So I'm going to do it again...' (Future Tense) Oh, well.

It works for me. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nuv96sP7XLc

Thats odd. I clicked it now and its 100% there. 1h 35 in total. At the time it was streaming it was there too. It definitely did not end nor did it Count Down to Nothing nor did any of the live viewers have any tech difficulties in watching it :/ Plus I don't believe sharing knowledge or enthusiasm is a Sin. Lol. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nuv96sP7XLc

Who else wants to go beyond the Magenta 737's in MSFS and go old school with the 737 Classic and Sperry A/p? I took the Highly Versatile 737-200C on an Arctic spin yesterday and had a blast! So I'm going to do it again this time FCOM Tutorial Style :) Luckily the FlyJsim 737 is arriving to X-Plane in June, but sadly no MSFS equivalent as of yet :/

Wow, very helpful. Thanks for sharing :)

Interesting. What modifications did you do ? 👀

Indeed. That's the major us point.

Also some people select NAV on the ground and then TOGA which overrides it leading to an embarrassing situation later. Seen this too often by Real 737 Pilots streamers 🤣

So I went to the Paris Air and Space Museum and was so excited to see Concorde that I couldn’t resist giving a virtual tour of the cockpit using their interactive app. Being a hardcore Concorde flight simmer for years certainly helped! Here's a short video of the experience. I had to cut out parts where other people were in the video asking questions for obvious reasons. An important point about the Autothrottle usage is discussed within: The A/T is used for cruise and approach only - not climb (which I've seen many msfs users doing which makes me want to do this: 🤦‍♂️) I've never used the autothrottle while climbing — it's simply pointless. Moreover, It's completely optional to use it in supercruise. "Max Climb" and "Max Cruise" modes do their job very well even without the autothrottle. Many people compare the Concorde to an Airbus and its "climb" mode. Most of the Concorde’s flight is performed with the throttle levers at full power. Thanks to the engine rating systems and the autopilot’s excellent "max climb" modes, there’s simply no need to touch the throttle levers. Concorde flies best at maximum speed, so why limit it? Sometimes, while climbing, you can reduce thrust slightly if the center of gravity (CG) shift isn’t keeping up with the Mach number. However, this happens very rarely and is usually because the pilot didn’t start pumping fuel in time or miscalculated the fuel limit in the 11th tank. But you don’t need the autothrottle for this. What was originally intended to be a private memory quickly turned out to be an interactive experience as a crowd gathered to hear my explanation. Even other visitors doing other tours started to notice. It was a very proud moment for me. :) Hope this helps fellow concorde fans and enthusiasts. Cheers, Joshua757

That is interesting insight. Thanks for sharing. I haven't experienced that at all. I usually tune in a valid, random ILS frequency on both sides and do the auto land test, which is probably why I didn't notice.

It should show EPR 50

It is surprising :)

No problem at all!

There is a DOP selection in the A/P which i think may be for GPS but I'm not sure.

The nightlighting is amazing. Its FS2004?! No Way...

Yeah I sometimes get FSL Conc CTD's too though they're more common for me during the sim loading if I click another tab during that time.

Thanks for your kind words. I appreciate your honest, mature insights. I paticularly like the Harrier and F-16! They hold a special place in my heart. 🙂

Thanks ! Much appreciated. Same was happening to me.

Well said 🙌

It is great when a dev offers great assistance 👍 🙂

At least we can both agree that we like the DC-9 plane but not the addon. Lol. Hard disagree about MScenery equivalent. As explained in my original post. You just have to take a look at their latest 737-100 which proves my point (!) Again, this does not put the DC-9 addon in the clear. I have seen other reddit comments too in the past stating its fruitless to draw comparisons between them. The reviews are mixed: some/most have expressed distaste while some have actually praised its night lighting. With that being said, yes the addon leaves much to be desired. I agree with that entirely. The DC-9 sure does deserve more attention in the sim world and I hope someone will one day make it right.