With this kind of quality - We don't need FS-X

[Guest PhilR]

http://forums.avsim.net/user_files/156603.jpghttp://forums.avsim.net/user_files/156604.jpgEnjoy.

[timest 472]

Looks great!Tim

[Guest PhilR]

I obtained your amazing product from fs2004.org and never looked backSun is stunning.

[timest 472]

Thanks Phil... just wait till the newest is released :) SOON!

[RyanF2009 0]

Maybe I should make some personal attack on you...

[Guest PhilR]

>Maybe I should make some personal attack on you...You really shouldn't as you'll probably get banned from the avsim forums.

[RyanF2009 0]

Aha! Good thinking, maybe you should've thought about that a little bit earlier...

[Guest]

Wow you don't want FSX. Thanks for announcing that along with a hundred other people on this forum, as if anyone really cares what software you buy.

[Guest TRK3586]

Speak for yourself :)

[Guest niceguy2782]

In a fwe more FS9 months, that FS9 sun is going to swallow the FS9 earth :-eeklol ... j/k ... now don't make me launch the "I want FSX so bad I ..." caption contest :-hah

[1mikel151 71]

http://forums.avsim.net/user_files/156603.jpgSpeak for yourself bro! :-erksRegards, MichaelKDFWhttp://www.calvirair.com/mcpics/ambanner.jpg

[JonRD463 146]

I've never understood the need for people to state their own opinion in terms of "we". Does it create some sort of percieved strength in numbers, where the holder of said opinion would otherwise feel weak, when the nebulous "we" is used in place of the singular "I"?In any case, the picture does not speak for me. I am very much looking forward to FSX. I'm even over my initial frustration at the phone-home verification.This is not, in any way, to take away from timest's fabulous work with REP. To that, I say Bravo! FS9 has never looked better!

[timest 472]

>I've never understood the need for people to state their own>opinion in terms of "we". Does it create some sort of>percieved strength in numbers, where the holder of said>opinion would otherwise feel weak, when the nebulous "we" is>used in place of the singular "I"?>>In any case, the picture does not speak for me. I am very much>looking forward to FSX. I'm even over my initial frustration>at the phone-home verification.>>This is not, in any way, to take away from timest's fabulous>work with REP. To that, I say Bravo! FS9 has never looked>better!>Thank you Jon, I didn't take it negatively... some people will like and some won't :)Take care Tim :D

[Murmur 3,941]

>Speak for yourself bro!Well, honestly, how many of you would have been tricked in thinking that these shots:http://forums.avsim.net/dcboard.php?az=sho...id=242697&page=or these:http://forums.avsim.net/dcboard.php?az=sho...id=242691&page=or these:http://forums.avsim.net/dcboard.php?az=sho...id=242660&page=were from FSX and not FS9?I think REP will make a lot of people great delay their transition to FSX.Marco

[Guest alex333]

>Someone give this guy an award ! Thanks Tim. The award for timest for his beautiful textures would be very well deserved, but still Phil's fsx bashing picture does not speak for me. In this case: "I" am not "we". ;)