I am going to try this driver, and if it messes up my system, I'll...I'll... Well I don't know what I'll do. hahaNo I won't hold you personally responsible. heh.Did you use Driver Cleaner to clear out the old?RhettAMD 3700+ (@2.5 ghz), eVGA 7800GT 256 (94.47), ASUS A8N-E, PC Power 510 SLI, 2 GB Corsair XMS 3-3-3-8, WD 250 gig 7200 rpm SATA2, CoolerMaster Praetorian

always a good ideasee also here:http://forums.avsim.net/dcboard.php?az=sho...id=369071&page=

Tried these driver's replacing 9147.No change here ,same frame rate but happy for all that got a nice boost.John

This goes down in history as the first time aftermarket hack drivers that have ever helped me.In limited testing, I got about a 10% fps increase using these drivers.I was using 91.47 WHQL on an eVGA 7800GT.10% means before EGLL = 18 fps AFTER = 20 fpsSo thanks for the find Mr. A!RhettAMD 3700+ (@2.5 ghz), eVGA 7800GT 256 (91.47), ASUS A8N-E, PC Power 510 SLI, 2 GB Corsair XMS 3-3-3-8, WD 250 gig 7200 rpm SATA2, CoolerMaster Praetorian

Same here, never had a hacked driver do anything. I think the author intentions with these drivers were quality oriented rather than performance. I will try though. I am running 91.47 on my 7800gtx and very happy with them.ThanksBob

I keep noticing people with GeForce cards using the 91.47 drivers. Was this a particularly good version compared to later versions? I just recently put in a 7800GS 256MB card, which shipped with 91.31 drivers. I updated to the 93.71 drivers after installation, but I'm wondering if I should roll back to 91.47.Mark KuebelerWestWind Airlineswww.flywestwind.com

>I keep noticing people with GeForce cards using the 91.47>drivers. Was this a particularly good version compared to>later versions? Not especially. The reason is, that 91.47 have been around for a long time as nVidia drivers go. 91.47 was the latest WHQL release for about a month or more. That's a long time, (relatively spking) :)>I just recently put in a 7800GS 256MB card,>which shipped with 91.31 drivers. I updated to the 93.71>drivers after installation, but I'm wondering if I should roll>back to 91.47.I wouldn't bother unless you are having problems with the 93.71's.There is nothing special about 91.47 other than the fact that it did seem to work well for most people in FS. But for me no better than 77.77 did, for example...I need to update my sig, it still says 91.47RhettAMD 3700+ (@2.5 ghz), eVGA 7800GT 256 (91.47), ASUS A8N-E, PC Power 510 SLI, 2 GB Corsair XMS 3-3-3-8, WD 250 gig 7200 rpm SATA2, CoolerMaster Praetorian