Wilco/FT Airbus

[Bonkster 1]

I said "large" turbine aircraft - not heavy! There's a difference! ;-)- Alex

[Guest monsoon]

Well actually large and heavy (no i dont mean for wake turbulence separation) are pretty much the same here in Canada. But the question was where did ya get 3000 hours of leisure flying in a "large" aircraft.

[Guest monsoon]

Please AVSIM. Take the add for the wilco bus off you main page. Dont support this crud in any manner whatsoever.

[Guest monsoon]

Thats because no other products came out this year. Do you think they woul have placed third IF omdg released their MD11, or AXP released the A320 or if Airsimmers released their 320? I extremely highly doubt it.

[twasono 3]

Wilco/Feelthere should thank to their customer for being their beta tester... :)

[virtualstuff 758]

>I've merged both the 2D and VC panels successfully with other>aircraft models (I don't particularly care for the>inaccuracies of the FT visual models) and they work>beautifully - I've merged the 330-200, 330-300, 340-300 and>340-600 to the CLS models and the A320 to the Overland models>and now have the best of all worlds!>How in earth did you manage and merge the VC with other models?http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y156/awf1/sign.jpg

[Bonkster 1]

I merged the "gauges"... not the actual "VC"... all of the afore mentioned aircraft have VC's.. so I simply swapped the gaugesin FSPS, made some BMP edits and now have the FT gauges in the VC's.

[virtualstuff 758]

>I merged the "gauges"... not the actual "VC"... all of the>afore mentioned aircraft have VC's.. so I simply swapped the>gaugesin FSPS, made some BMP edits and now have the FT gauges>in the VC's.That make no sense, since you loose a lot of functionality ;-)http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y156/awf1/sign.jpg

[Bonkster 1]

What functionality do I lose? Everything works just fine! If you're referring to things like the overhead panel, who cares? I never access that stuff from the VC anyway.