Never. Until CS fixes all the issues they left us with they should never be considered for ANY award...let alone a "Gold"....for anything they make.Legendary 707, 727 and C-130 Extra Pack are riddled with problems, bugs and inacuracies. Take a moment to visit their forum and have a listen to all the problems we have been trying to get fixed! How handy that, after all the promises, we now get "Development of this product is over". How very convenient. It's my own fault that I had to purchase 3 of their inferior and incomplete products to finally get the message...but get it I did. Never again will I spend a dime on a CS product...no matter how wonderful your reviews paint them as. "Oh, they are much better now"...really don't want to hear that...how does that help with the 3 products I have? It doesn't.Buy CS products at your own risk.

The CS 767 is excellent mate. I have it and I dont have any issues with it?

I do have some concerns regards to the review and award policy here. Compared with IGN and Gamespot reviews, AVSIM's are quite simple, after introductions(only a few reviews provide detail information) it's just a general like or dislike, and no classify at all.Aircraft add-on is much complex then a Console game. Since a console game is now being review in several category, the review here should be more specific. For aircraft, at least there should be some separate scores, such as, external model, VC, 2D panel, Avionics, Sound, failure management, Documents. And a over-all score in the end.Due to the nature of FS add-on worlds, each studio has their certain community, I am not critical here, but I do believe that the CS767 has a different market compared with LDS767. RegardsYufeng

Never. Until CS fixes all the issues they left us with they should never be considered for ANY award...let alone a "Gold"....for anything they make.Legendary 707, 727 and C-130 Extra Pack are riddled with problems, bugs and inacuracies. Take a moment to visit their forum and have a listen to all the problems we have been trying to get fixed! How handy that, after all the promises, we now get "Development of this product is over". How very convenient. It's my own fault that I had to purchase 3 of their inferior and incomplete products to finally get the message...but get it I did. Never again will I spend a dime on a CS product...no matter how wonderful your reviews paint them as. "Oh, they are much better now"...really don't want to hear that...how does that help with the 3 products I have? It doesn't.Buy CS products at your own risk.

Hear,hear! At last,a real lambasting of CS Products.And I cannot believe that PC Pilot magazine have just awarded them.What I do not like about them is how complicated they seem to want to make things just to get a mere repaint,never mind support,which is totally abysmal to say the least.And why oh why do they always sell their products in bits,e.g.base then making one buy expansion packs.Look at PMDG's recent MD-11.The pax and the cargo versions offered together,not as two separate buys.And their latest B-52 offer? Well,least said the best.I for one agree with you,strider,will not be buying any CS products.RICK

CS767 or LEVELD767 ?using the CS is good, but the Level D is still the standard as far as handling is concerned.