Well I was checking out some sites and and was also checking to see if there was anything new at the aerosim site. when I stumbled upon a Boeing 767 from aerosim for fsx its all in Japanese or course so will have to use a translator.http://www.aerosim.co.jp/aero/a-product/fs.../b767300fsx.htmhttp://www.aerosim.co.jp/aero/a-product/fs...67300fsx_ss.htm

Hm. I think it'll be of the system simulation level of their 747, which should bring VNAV and such without all the LDS767 and CS767 fidelity, so I can see this thing being sold to people who think the CLS767 is light and the LDS or CS767 too heavy. So yeah, there is a market, but I'd want them to do something else, something we don't have already done by three independent developers!

Hm. I think it'll be of the system simulation level of their 747, which should bring VNAV and such without all the LDS767 and CS767 fidelity, so I can see this thing being sold to people who think the CLS767 is light and the LDS or CS767 too heavy. So yeah, there is a market, but I'd want them to do something else, something we don't have already done by three independent developers!

lol yeah I totality agree with you! :( we really need some new aircraft models, that haven't been done for awhile. they should have continued with there L1011 or there sabb dash 8 etc etc or something else there are way to many 767 already lol.

I've got their B747-400, B777 and YS-11 for FSX, plus a lot of their FS9 stuff, so I'm fairly familiar with AeroSim. I suspect their 767 will be along the lines of their 777 and 747-400D - i.e nice 3D models and good flight modeling, but not hugely complex as far as in depth systems go. It is possible to make their 777 and 747 into quite nice things with the addition of ISG instruments and a bit of VC tweaking, but frankly, I'd prefer it if they'd update their FS9 B737-200 and DC-8 for FSX.I checked out the price of that 767, and it comes to 44 quid (pounds sterling), which for what is probably a fairly 'lite' product, is not especially great value in my book. Their Triple Seven is worth having since there is no other nicer model of one for FSX, and their 747-400D is worth having, since it is the high-frequency short range variant without the winglets, and both can be made better with ISG and such, but I'm not seeing a reason of that kind for their 767 when there is already the Level D one as well as other 'liter' ones that are much cheaper. If they knock the price down, I might get it just out of curiosity, but it's gonna have to be a lot cheaper than 44 quid before I'll take a chance on it. Odd that it doesn't show up on their main site though.Al

Good post Cesar.This 767 looks very good. I wonder why they have not advertised it in English. I wonder how we can purchase it and if it is safe to purchase it? I'm willing to give it a spin.Dennis

Out of curiosity, I actually clicked on the links (coloured boxes) on that website where it is advertised, and it does eventually take you to what is clearly an 'add to shopping basket' page, with a very obvious icon to complete the purchase, so I presume you could click on that, have your credit card deducted and then get a download link for the thing if you wanted it. I daresay it would a be a good model to merge with the Level D, but the manual is most likely in Japanese and it might simply be that they haven't got an English translation of it yet, which might explain why it's not on their normal (English) page.You could actually ask them I suppose. You can email AeroSim's English support here: [email protected]

Thank You Al!Already did - awaiting their response.Dennis

They seem to have the the 767 on there English page it says coming soon. looks like there working on the English manual installer etc etc. http://www.aerosim.co.jp/eigo/a-product_e/...767300fsx_e.htm :(

Pretty much what I suspected then. It'll be interesting to see exactly what features it has in comparison to their 777 and 747-400D, although it does look to be fairly 'lite', like their other FSX jets.Al

Pretty much what I suspected then. It'll be interesting to see exactly what features it has in comparison to their 777 and 747-400D, although it does look to be fairly 'lite', like their other FSX jets.Al

Hi Al yes it seems very lite I wish aerosim would lower the prices on there packages since there lite aircraft but of course that would never happen lol. but I honestly do wish them the best its nice to have other developer out there making aircraft.

Unless they make a 757, which seems likely since they appear to be tackling the Boeing range, I'm hoping they will do a revamped version of the 737-200. They could get away with doing a 'lite' version of that and still garner big sales, as it would not need an FMC.Al

I think I asked them once about a 737-200, but I can't remember what they responded. I'm not sure they even did... But indeed, I wish they made a package out of the 737-200. I don't think we need another 757... I mean, we have CS and QW that both offer rather good packages, and the LDS 757 is in the works although we have no idea how long it will take to complete it, of course. Nah, I don't think they should do a 757. They'd better revamp the planes of the Classic Liner packages, I think.Anyway, the 767 is released. Those that bought it: opinions are welcome!