March 11, 201115 yr Has anyone tried this out yet? How does it compare to REX for FS9? If anything, the price sure looks hard to beat.
March 12, 201115 yr Hey, Mad Dog! I decided to take a pass on this for exactly the reasons you question it: mainly because it seemed to do the same as REX, which I already own and Love, and I just couldn't imagine that it would do a better job. At that price, I'd love to find out I was wrong though.Best regards, buddy! Smooth Skies! -- Chuck B. MACHINE 1:FS2004/WinXP Pro 64, Intel Core 2 Duo E8600 Clocked to 4.35 GHz, Corsair H50, Asus Maximus Formula, 4GB PNY XLR8 DDR2 @1067, ATI 4870 and 4650, WD Raptor 10K RPM 160 GB HD, Seagate 500 mgb 32mgb cache, 2 Analog 2HTGs w/ 3 19" I-INC flat panel monitors 1280x1024x32, and 1 17" at 1280 x 1024, PC Silencer 750 Quad, FSPassengers, FSUPIC, (Payware), WideFS MACHINE 2: Dell Dimension, P4, WideClient, FDC Live Cockpit, Pro Flight Emulator, Active Sky v6.5 MACHINE 3: ASUS u81A Laptop, Windows 7 (what a joke!), WideClient, FlightSim Commander
March 13, 201115 yr I bought an older version of this about a year ago and I love it.The cumulus clouds are great on max density, and I really like the water coloration and effects.The only negative for me is the concrete runways, but they're not that bad.You also get an enhanced reflections file and different trees.Compared to REX(which I have only read about), you only get one set of textures here, and no weather engine of course. Athlon X3 450 3.2Ghz, 4GB 7-7-7-24 RAM, ATI 5750 1GB video card, Win 7 64
March 14, 201115 yr I agree with fsnl. Clouds are excellent to fly through. This was one of the few times I was flying up and the clouds made me think I was going down. Had to check the VSI. Almost vertigo. This was at dusk.JimCYWG
March 14, 201115 yr Author Thanks for the input... much appreciated. I think I'm just going to stick with REX. Too many textures, too little time :(
Create an account or sign in to comment