Well, I'm pretty sure the Flight Sim Lab's big developer Lefteris has been a member for numerous PMDG products as well...and may continue to be so I think we should all be patient and let FSL do it's thing.They have a very promising aircraft coming up if they can correctly emulate ARINC 429 and all the associated Airbus wizardry.

well they do need the partnership to get the most out of the product, alot of other producers didnt have the partnership and failed in many stages because of the complicated systems and performance of the machine, and thus they need either the help of an airline or the help of airbus it self, and as we know PMDG, either produce it as real as it gets or never engage it. yes i know that and thats why i said that i understand that there are other projects of a320 being built, but what about the 330 and 340? i totaly agree with you and thats why PMDG is not engaging airbus, not enough info to rely on :Si totaly realise that airbus info isnt hard to get at all, i can read the aircraft performance, i can read the manuals and i have seen the QRH of real world airlines and i have them too for my self, its not of a problem at all. but the help and the sponsorship of the airbus in reality will make things go better the easier,i actually didnt understand if you are trying to say that airsimmer is good or bad, but in my post all i said is that air simmer failed and why? you have done the flight normaly, but you cant say that your aircraft doesnt have any bug onboard and major bugs not small bugs, where if those bugs were on real aircraft it would never fly. i am not exagerating and trying to say they are bad, i bought the product and i only fly airbus using air simmer, but i expected more out of it thats all.and i agree with you, if PMDG didnt start a320 yet, i prefer they get us a T7 instead for now. not to forget the market of short haul aircrafts is saturated, its time to focus more on wide body. A330 A340 A380 .well, whats wrong with PMDG race those others and get on the top of the list of making the best products for FS giving them superiority in everything, i dont care if it will be kind of a monopoly or taking the profits of others ways, NO PAIN NO GAIN, and i will wish all the good luck for the one who works hard to get me the best machine to fly with. PMDG or anyone else, as long as i take off and land without the need of kicking my pc or throwing my keyboard out of the window!! haha

In case you didn't realise I am the tech guy for the Basic and Advanced over there. I take it you only have the basic? Anyway as I tell most people if you are having issues it's probably a good idea to register and post on the tech forum and let me know ;)Regards

Boeing has been developing/manufacturing the 787 since 2005/2008 so it could be reasonable that PMDG is developing (schedule of two-three years) the 787 as the secret project, in my thinking at least.

And what an awesome secret project.... and addition to our virtual hangars... that would be :( Regards,Trent Hopkinson

Edited January 8, 201214 yr by hopskip

In case you didn't realise I am the tech guy for the Basic and Advanced over there. I take it you only have the basic? Anyway as I tell most people if you are having issues it's probably a good idea to register and post on the tech forum and let me know ;)Regards

i knew you since you replied and i corrected many issues with my basic edition from your answers to other customers, but my friend and he is my neighbor got the advanced and we fly it all togather and we have enjoyed it manytimes, and again all am saying is that still the aircraft is not 100% ready yet, i donno if you have any other opinion, but still many issues are arousing in both the basic and advanced, and what proves me right is the huge number of issues arousing in the forum out there, i have loved air simmer, and i still do i have nothing against them, and anyone asks about it, i advice buying it with no discussion. but we need a full machine, and again thanks for your help