BeechCraft Dutchess around Seattle X-Plane 10

Meh, I have seen nothing yet that makes me want to take a plunge into X-Plane.It just looks Really drycompared to FSX. That's the only way I can Describe it.Great shots though mate, keep them coming, nice to see something different evey once in a while.

Edited February 19, 201214 yr by DeadlyInertia

Meh, I have seen nothing yet that makes me want to take a plunge into X-Plane.It just looks Really drycompared to FSX. That's the only way I can Describe it.Great shots though mate, keep them coming, nice to see something different evey once in a while.

Truthfully DI, X-plane is really not about visuals (never has been) IMO, but the flying experience is different than FSX/FS9. We use it here in a flight training facility where we have a FAA approved PFC Modular Flight-deck: http://flypfc.com/?/training-systems/mfd/The other thing I find about X-plane is that it does not possess an in-depth aircraft systems engine (although 10 may have a lot to offer)

Nice shots. I didn't like xplane when I first got it, but then after spending some time with it, I started to find so many things with it that I liked, that I'm spending very little time with fsx now. It's a different take on flight sim. The system depth of the crj is model is very detailed, not quite to Ngx levels but getting ther. Im liking the graphics of xp10 better than fsx at this point but that's just a matter of taste. Both look good in their own way. Rob

Thanks very much for the feed back,You're right.X-Plane isn't for everyone.It does take some getting used to coming from FSX.I find myself flying in X-Plane more and more after getting used to it's UI and little quirks,The performance for me is Stellar!The fantsastic sense of AirSpeed I get and Beautiful Night Lighting has me Hooked!Cheers!

Edited February 19, 201214 yr by Phantom88