Then that is your problem and not mine.

 

Provide solid evidence for bold statements and you wouldn't have to deal with trolls like me that question information. :lol:

 

Provide solid evidence for bold statements and you wouldn't have to deal with trolls like me that question information. :lol:

 

LOL Nice comeback, Ben! And yes, I too am very skeptical of those figures, unless he flies facing 90 degrees straight up into the sky with a 190x zoom. LOL

I don't know guys, it might be achievable, Jackson Hole's not too big of an FPS hog and neither is the Carenado Grand Caravan. It's not as though he's claiming 60+ FPS in the NGX @ KJFK + Manhattan X on 3 screens, in fact it sounds like just 1 screen.

At Jackson Hole in FTX with all sliders at max including 100% traffic in a Carenado C208B with hires textures I have over 60 FPS.

I don't know guys, it might be achievable, Jackson Hole's not too big of an FPS hog and neither is the Carenado Grand Caravan. It's not as though he's claiming 60+ FPS in the NGX @ KJFK + Manhattan X on 3 screens, in fact it sounds like just 1 screen.

 

100% traffic is a tremendous amount of AI.... I am just saying that I think that those numbers are a bit off.... :rolleyes:

100% traffic is a tremendous amount of AI.... I am just saying that I think that those numbers are a bit off.... :rolleyes:

 

Perhaps, perhaps not. I mean, 6 cores @ 5GHz very well could handle the job. I don't know, I doubt my 4.9GHz Ivy Bridge would struggle

I don't know guys, it might be achievable, Jackson Hole's not too big of an FPS hog and neither is the Carenado Grand Caravan. It's not as though he's claiming 60+ FPS in the NGX @ KJFK + Manhattan X on 3 screens, in fact it sounds like just 1 screen.

 

Hmmm You do have a point, Tech.

 

Boswell, can you let us know exactly the situation you get these results