Every day there are new flightplans in the AVSIM library, released by United Traffic Team/Michael Babitskiy. Not sure he is doing them all himself or whether there is a team behind it, but even then it's still an amazing output rate. They include some very big airlines that are probably complex to do.

 

So how good are they? So far my quality benchmark is stuff by AIG and some of their "friends", where flightplans are usually complete in terms of flights and fleet, have a good balancing of aircraft usage, and are checked for errors. How do the UTT plans compare to that? If they are at least almost as good I'd get them, but if they are not good then I rather stick with an older plan and wait for a quality one to come out.

 

Anyone used them and can say more about them?

 

Thanks

I have been using several of the UTT flightplans ever since they appeared in the library.

Certainly it is difficult to be 100% sure everything is fine with a flightplan.

But each time I install a new FP package I thoroughly check my FS9 with ACA.

No errors have been found so far with the UTT flightplans I applied.

I don't tend to find any errors with them, it seems ok to me. I do however notice (On scrutinising the BA flightplans) that the correct aircraft aren't necessarily used on the the correct routes (77W's assigned to the routes that they are currently operating and some others too that they've never operated to and are not expected to visit in the near future).

 

If you're not too fussy then I find that they are OK.