October 2, 200421 yr No flaming please!FlightOne: Nice job! I have put about 2.5 hours on the 172R (since my download 2.6 hours ago) and I hit the numbers (very close) like I used to in the real Skyhawk (172N). It was like De-ja-vu, all over again! (Thanks Yogi...)Question: Has anyone flown Solo in it yet?I've experienced severe rolling tendency to the left if I fly solo. I put in 210 pounds for the pilot; trying to keep it realistic :(The default M$ version does also roll but not as severe.The handling is great if I counter-balance with 210 pounds in the right seat; almost hands-off flying. Almost.Again, Great job Guys! I can't wait to repaint. The Archer is awesome too!Best Regards,Jim Donlin
October 2, 200421 yr >Question: Has anyone flown Solo in it yet?>I did. And I was actually wondering about that too - the roll seems bit too strong.Michael J.WinXP-Home,AMD64 3500+,Abit AV8, Radeon X800 Pro,WD 36GB Raptor,1 GB PC3200 http://www.reality-xp.com/community/nr/rsc/rxp-higher.jpg Michael J.
October 2, 200421 yr Commercial Member No problem on this end at all. Absolutely smooth and straight.Maybe balance your load to both seats (FS seems to handle weight distribution a little strange sometimes), and make sure you have equal fuel in both tanks. Thanks, Steve Halpern Flight One Software
October 2, 200421 yr Hi, I guess the point was to NOT balance the load equally, but that the effect of uneven loading (which is realistic on solo flights) seems overexaggerated. possible solution: The station load of the two front seats can be moved closer to the "centerline" of the aircraft. Does it use the same values like the default C172 (I don
Create an account or sign in to comment