March 25, 201412 yr I wouldn't bother with CS 75/76 having the Level-D 767 around. Is a much more solid product. The virtual cockpit is a bit old by today's standards, but systems and flight model work just like the real plane. Can't say the same about CS.For the most part, I'd agree. Although I've never used the Level-D, the general consenus is enough for me to assume it's better than the CS offering, however I still think CS has a few quality products, but I'm gonna add the Level-D to my post as well.
March 25, 201412 yr Author Gee it looks like I went to flightsim.com and registered a couple of weeks before my brother passed away. I made a new post back then about being away and wanting to start back in flight sims. I don't remember this at all, My head was not on straight back then, I am glad I am back to normal and life is going smoothly. Also I want to say that I did take some time to check out the links that were posted above and also did check out the image forum. I am impressed with the advancement the sims have taken. I also checked out you tube and looked at the videos of FSX, and XP10 and yes there is a difference as stated but I think I will just start with FSX for now and eventually try XP10. Scenery and panels/aircraft are a must for me, and I want them to look as real as they get, are there any must haves for US scenery or is a global package the only way to get this. Nick Sciortino
March 26, 201412 yr Scenery and panels/aircraft are a must for me, and I want them to look as real as they get, are there any must haves for US scenery or is a global package the only way to get this. Orbx regions are cream of the crop. They don't have the entire NA covered, but this is their goal.
Create an account or sign in to comment