September 28, 201411 yr Yes I have 3 white ports labeled DVI. Actually I was mistakes, the white DVI ports are now being used. So here is one more question: My NVidia 590 cards say max resolution 2048 x 1536 max VGA and 2560 x 1600 max digital. I am running at 1900 x 1080. So if I buy a Ultra Sharp monitor I have a feeling my video cards won't allow me to get the super high resolution and I will really see no difference?? Correct You cant go 4k, no You can go WQHD which is 2560x1440 (16:9) or WQXGA 2560x1600 (16:10) with no problems. Glenn Ryzen 3700X, X570 Pro Wifi, 32GB 3600mhz RAM, Nvidia Titan Xp "Galactic Empire", RM750x PSU, H700 case, 2x NVMe M2 SSD, 1x SATA SSD
September 29, 201411 yr http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824001551 27" 1920X1080 monitor. I use this one and it looks awesome! They can be found on ebay for around $200 ATP MEL,CFI,CFII,MEI. Type Ratings B-737, ERJ-190,ERJ-170
September 29, 201411 yr In response to Ray Proudfoot - Posted 26 September 2014 - 09:01 AM How close would you sit to a 49" screen? And the resolution of 3840 x 2160 would seriously impact on frame rates I suspect.-----------------------------------------I think a 4K monitor/display with the latest hardware would be no problem. I just built an Intel -i7-4790K PC with 16GB and a GTX-780Ti SC. With absolutely no overclocking on either of those components I am running FSX in DX10 mode with all setting 100% maxed out on three 1080P monitors and I am getting typical frame rates between 17-30fps (I have it limited to 30) with the absolute worse I have seen was 8fps flying over Manhattan with Awesome airport packs for all the regional airports as well as a MegaEarthScenery Ultra-Res pack for NYC. Again, this was with thousands of boats and cars and planes flying all around and all the graphics settings maxed out and still 8FPS. I expect a single 4K monitor with the new hardware will be no problem. It sure would be nice sometimes to see my gauges more clearly in Virtual Cockpit mode without having to zoom in so much. When the prices come down I will consider a 30-inch or so 4k monitor sandwiched by a couple of my 24-inch 1080p monitors for controls, gauges, radios, alt views, and such. Again, I am running all three monitors of the one GTX-780Ti SC Arjuna Bug Asus Z97-Deluxe, i7-4790K, EVGA GTX-1080ti SC2 11GB, 32GB Corsair DDR3-2133, 3 x Samsung 1TB 860 EVO SSD, 512GB 850 Pro SSD, 512GB 840 Pro SSD, 2 x WD GOLD 10TB (RAID1), LG 27UD58-B 27" Ultra HD 4K Monitors.
September 29, 201411 yr Moderator Arjunabug, A frame rate of 8fps is totally unflyable. Also, many people don't fly in DX10 mode. How much of a frame rate boost does that give over DX9? Expecting something will be fine and knowing something will be fine are two different things. Paulyg123 would want confirmation - preferably by seeing it himself - before parting with serious money. He only has a 590, not a 780Ti. There's a big difference in performance. He also said he wanted a 32"-36" monitor so I fail to understand why people are recommending as high as 47". There are physical constraints to consider as well as cost and performance. As I said in an earlier post I'm very happy with my Sony 32" LED TV. Its resolution of 1920*1080 viewed from around 3ft gives excellent detail and frame rates are unchanged from my previous Dell 24" 1920*1200 monitor. Ray (Cheshire, England). System: P3D v5.3HF2, Intel i9-13900K, MSI 4090 GAMING X TRIO 24G, Crucial T700 4Tb M.2 SSD, Asus ROG Maximus Z790 Hero, 32Gb Corsair Vengeance DDR5 6000Mhz RAM, Win 11 Pro 64-bit, BenQ PD3200U 32” UHD monitor, Fulcrum One yoke, Fulcrum Throttle Quadrant. Cheadle Hulme Weather website.
Create an account or sign in to comment