1. When I load up the plane I get a messege that say something to the effect that I need a registered FSUIPC, what will not work correctly without a registered FSUIPC?2. What is the top cruise speed of a P-3C Orion?3. What is the landing speed of a P-3C Orion?Thanks for your help :-)

This is from the "FSNAV_add" folder which is located in the "pc3_pack" folder. doesn't answere all the questions. In fact, with a model so good, I don't know why there are no check lists and pilot's manual provided.[Lockheed P-3C Orion]climbspeed=240climbfuel=9000climbrate=1500cruisespeed=300cruisefuel=4800cruisealtitude=21300descentspeed=120descentfuel=1000descentrate=1000I too, received the same message regarding FSUIPC. Also, the VC view doesn't work, although the VC folder is in the A/C folder.And, has anyone noticed if the #1 engine props are spinning faster than the other three engine props? Mine does and the throttles are all set to idle.

VNE is 405 kias at sea level.Rotate Speed is 131 kts at 135 000 lbsor 115 kts at 100 000 lbs (115 kts is as low as we go for rotate).Landing Speed is weight dependent as well:-heavy weight (135 000 lbs) 148 kts with full flap-light weight (80 000 lbs) 114 kts with full flapNormal Climb Speed: 220 ktsStandard Descent Speed: 250 ktsCheers,

Thanks for the information guys :-)

>And, has anyone noticed if the #1 engine props are spinning>faster than the other three engine props? Mine does and the>throttles are all set to idle. >Do a cold start with a-priori everything shut down using a Cessna 172 as previous a/c to make sure all things are off. Making sure "both" magnetos are off...allemn

I found the problem as it was in the sensitivities portion on my TQ. Also, I was unaware (duh) that there are two versions appearing in the select aircraft box, one non-VC and one with VC. All works now.By the way, I emailed the developers with my questions, and while their English is a little confusing at times, but a whole lot better than I if I tried in their language, they got me going in the right direction. Glad to see the response.I also asked if they would consider developing the overhead panel to add more involvement in the flight experience. Haven't heard a response yet. Maybe an engineer's panel too?