May 11, 201511 yr Hi. I am trying to recompile a bgl file (this is FS9) from an .sca file (made with BGLAnalyze FS5-8) but I keep getting the same error each time. The resulting bgl is slightly smaller than the original and the information lost means the runway turns from black to light brown - some overlay information is apparently lost. The cmd windows shows this after running the scasm line: found sections: 0x00000200Error in line 39 -> Runway( N46:14:17.01 E006:06:32.14 Alt 430Heading 45 L -> in expression .. FF Threshold 0 T ..VIS SCN -> entrys: 223 mem: 41814Linebuffer 393/1048576Maxlabels 11/1500 Maxpatches 16/2000Scasm compilation status: error(s) 1 and the original .sca file (whole object), is this: ; ----------------------------------------; Object # 1, offset: 0x000A size: 110 bytes (0x006E);; Lat: 0004E681Dh Lon: 00458189Bh; ----------------------------------------Area( 5 N46:14:17.01 E006:06:32.14 30 ) LayerCall( :L000020 24 ) Jump( : ):L000020 Smoothing( 1 ) Runway( N46:14:17.01 E006:06:32.14 <<<-------------------------------------- this is 'Line 39' Alt 430.1 Heading 45.4 Length 12795 ; in feet Width 164 ; in feet Markers 77 Id 5 Lights 16 Surface FF Threshold 0 ThrOffN 1082 ThrOffF 0 ExtN 0 ExtF 0 ThrLightsN 01 AprLN 9 ThrLightsF 41 AprLF 10 StrobesF 9 ) Smoothing( 0 ) ReturnEndA Looks OK to me?? The file is from an LSGG scenery I found on an FS backup drive. Looks like screenshots of the Flylogic Geneva - not that I recall buying that particular airport (well it'd be over ten years ago now). I am having a go at getting rid of some of the less than attractive features, like the blurred grass and apron tarmac textures (this is really old scenery now of course - maybe I should just buy the FSDT version, but I am frustrated not to be able to get this to work!); this scasm error is stopping me from doing so though. Tried adding: Set( LINBUF 1024 )Set( BUF 600 ); to the start of the .sca file before compiling but that doesn't help. Any insight appreciated. Thanks. Martin Martin Stebbing, EGLF (UK)
May 11, 201511 yr Looks to me like the compiler doesn't like Surface FF. Maybe try Surface 1 or Surface 01 regards, Joe The best gift you can give your children is your time.
May 12, 201511 yr Author Joe, you were quite right. I changed FF (what does that mean?) to 01. At first, it didn't look hopeful, as the file size was reduced from the original by just a fraction, but in FS9 everything looks good, runway and all, so I can go ahead with my modifications. Many thanks. Martin Stebbing, EGLF (UK)
Create an account or sign in to comment