Guys, I know there is a lot of discussion going on using ORBX OpenLC vs UTX V2 or a combination of them. I've made some screenshots which show the difference. 

 

Shots are taken around EHAM the Netherlands with ORBX Global and without Vector installed.

 

UTX V2 without ORBX OpenLC Europe activated in the scenery library.

 

 

UTX V2 and ORBX OpenLC Europe above UTX in the scenery library.

 

 

ORBX OpenLC Europe between UTX  Landclass Urban and UTX Landclass Vegetation in the scenery library, which is advised in the UTX manuals.

 

 

You see, it make a lot of difference how it is placed and activated in the scenery library. For me I'm not sure yet what gives me the best result. I think it will be a personal taste.

 

What's your opinion?

Have you looked at the real view via Google Earth to see which options is closer to reality? Curious...

Well, I cant speak for UTX Europe v2 but I can tell you that OpenLC Europe is very good in terms of replicating what Google Earth shows (for the most part anyway) 

 

I did a lot of comparisons with GE when OpenLC Europe was released and it was pretty good considering the scope of the project.

 

Edit - I just looked at GE for the EHAM area and OpenLC is certainly giving better results with it being on. Im not sure which of the bottom two pics is closer to reality but its certainly better with OpenLC included than not.