Hi all. Could you guys explain by how much the ground textures have improved? I am pretty sure that fs9 can produce 5M per pixel if I remember rightly. You see I predomently fly Helo's low level so cannot wait to get hold of fsx. I have lots of ground add-ons, most of them photo-realistic and also UK VFR Photographic scenery. Will the above add-ons work with fsx and will they appear better?Many thanks, Keith

>Hi all. Could you guys explain by how much the ground>textures have improved? I am pretty sure that fs9 can produce>5M per pixel if I remember rightly. You see I predomently fly>Helo's low level so cannot wait to get hold of fsx. I have>lots of ground add-ons, most of them photo-realistic and also>UK VFR Photographic scenery. >>Will the above add-ons work with fsx and will they appear>better?>>Many thanks, Keith They look really good, with support for (I believe) 7cm per pixel, if the slider is right.The demo has 1M textures (at least that's where it stops making a big difference on my version).I would suggest checking out the screenshots here or at FSInsider. The difference for low level VFR flight is really noticable. It looks great.

Thats exactly what I am looking for, decent low-level screenshots. Any links greatly accepted. I have checked out fsinsider and it has just 6 or 7 shots and none of scenery. Thanks anyway.

check gamespot and the forums there some fantastic pictures of low level flight....

>Thats exactly what I am looking for, decent low-level>screenshots. Any links greatly accepted. >>I have checked out fsinsider and it has just 6 or 7 shots and>none of scenery. Thanks anyway.It's all over the place. Scroll down about 3 threads or so:http://forums.avsim.net/dcboard.php?az=sho..._id=15977&page=follow the link therein, let the flash run its course, then select "Dynamic Living World" and you'll see comparison shots, to which you can move your mouse and transfer back and forth from FS9 to FSX.gives a very good comparisonRhett