November 7, 20205 yr Hi there!I fly c172 classic with modded gns 530. When I select ILS approach it gives me for example runway 16 ils approach X and Y. What the difference between them and which one I have to choose? I used to a2a c172 gns 400 in FSX-SE, and it was so much simpler and different..
November 7, 20205 yr This is true also in the real world. The approaches might have different minimas, platform altitudes, equipment requirement (despite both being ILS) and missed approach procedures / climb gradients. You would need to consult the actual plates to determine how they differ. Edited November 7, 20205 yr by SAS443 EASA PPL SEPL + NQ / CB-IR in progress MSFS24 | X-Plane 12
November 7, 20205 yr try Skyvector( mainly US airports?) or chartfox for starters. Both free resources EASA PPL SEPL + NQ / CB-IR in progress MSFS24 | X-Plane 12
November 7, 20205 yr 7 hours ago, arncliffe said: Hi there!I fly c172 classic with modded gns 530. When I select ILS approach it gives me for example runway 16 ils approach X and Y. What the difference between them and which one I have to choose? I used to a2a c172 gns 400 in FSX-SE, and it was so much simpler and different.. You need to look at approach plates to find out a difference. Remember that approaches are based on nav data which is outdated in MSFS Life time flight sim enthusiast, current airplane owner 172P (past C182F). FAA CP/IR ASEL/AMEL, FI ASELMy System: AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D , MSI X870 GAMING PLUS, 64G RAM, ASUS RTX5090, 4T SSDPut my hands on (pic/dual/given)7GCAA, 8KCAB, BE24, BE76, BE35-C33, BE35, C150, C152, C172B/N/P/R/SP, 182F, M20E,M20C, M20J, AT6(SNJ4), PA28-140,PA28-151, PA28-161,PA28-181,PA28RT-201,PA28R-180/201T, PA24-250, PA32-300R, PA44, AC114, YAK-18T, YAK-52, SR22
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.