November 7, 20214 yr I'd definitely say 4K monitor. My 4K 27" screen is a bit too small for me, thinking of grabbing a 32"+ monitor or a 40"+ TV instead of it. Previously I was using my 23" 1080p monitor but that was just too small, it was uncomfortable to use and I always had to move the camera to make routine changes like baro pressure. If you're using an older or low-end card, spend enough for a decent 4K monitor and run it at 4K medium or high. If that's not good enough use resolution scaling but always keep the monitor either at its native res or at 50%. At this point, I'd say you should keep it to 4K Medium or 4K High, as long as you can reach 30fps fairly consistently. If you can do that, don't even bother getting a new graphics card at this point. I only got my 3070 ti because my old 570 ti was inadequate for even 1080p low. R9-5900X, RTX 3070 Ti, 32GB DDR4, NVMe (1TB EX920), Dell P2715Q 4K Honeycomb Alpha & Honeycomb Bravo
November 11, 20214 yr I recently acquired a 38 inch ultrawide at 3840 x 1600 res. It's not 4k but I'm starting to think that in terms of immersion this is a better option vs a traditional 16:9 4k monitor. Plus less heavy on the GPU MSFS. Hardware: AMD 5600X @4.0Ghz, Corsair H100i RGB Pro XT AIO, MSI MPG B550i Gaming Edge WiFi mobo, RTX 3080ti 12GB FE GPU , G.Skill TridentZ Royal 32GB (2x16) DDR4-3600 RAM CL16, PNY XLR8 3030 1 TB SSD (OS + SIM), Crucial P5 1TB M.2 pcie-3 NVMe SSD (data) . Corsair SF750 80+ Platinum PSU, NZXT H200i Mini ITX Tower. 38" LG UltraGear 38GN950-B display. 4x QL120 fans
November 11, 20214 yr Author On 11/7/2021 at 1:30 PM, bobsama said: I'd definitely say 4K monitor. Are you answering me? If so see first page for what I went for and why. 😉 1440P and 27 inches. Quote If you're using an older or low-end card See first page. Not low end. 3090 FTW3.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.