17 hours ago, kevinfirth said:

I still have the missized 650 in the VC panel   Interesting, if you look at my first video in the OP, you can see the 650 is correctly sized there....??

I'm sorry I didn't catch this specific issue in your 2nd post!

This is what controls the display position and dimensions:

gauge00=rxpGTN!GTN_650_2, 0, 0,677,297,NO_BEZEL

Since the W/H ratio seems correct from the look of it (didn't do the maths), the only explanation to me would be the 3D model is not UV mapping the texture correctly.

In other words, the gauge renders into the VC texture named texture=$GTN650 but this texture UV mapping on the actual GTN 3D model in the VC is not proportionally correct. If you look closer, the VC entry dimensions for the GTN 650 were in the first post:

size_mm=1024,512

Your latest panel is using size_mm=1024,1024 hence the GTN rendering smaller!

Edited December 28, 20214 yr by RXP

10 minutes ago, RXP said:

All 4 of them (the ones I've indicated)?

All apart from the console, which is the vc element containing the 3d model parts of the various gauges on the right hand side.  Without it, you get a flat grey panel.

 

3 minutes ago, RXP said:

I'm sorry I didn't catch this specific issue in your 2nd post!

This is what controls the display position and dimensions:

gauge00=rxpGTN!GTN_650_2, 0, 0,677,297,NO_BEZEL

Since the W/H ratio seems correct from the look of it (didn't do the maths), the only explanation to me would be the 3D model is not UV mapping the texture correctly.

In other words, the gauge renders into the VC texture named texture=$GTN650 but this texture UV mapping on the actual GTN 3D model in the VC is not proportionally correct. If you look closer, the VC entry dimensions for the GTN 650 where

size_mm=1024,512

Your latest panel is using size_mm=1024,1024 hence the GTN rendering smaller!

I see, I copied it from the C182 because that seemed to work just fine there! Trying the change now...

@RXP Success! Thankyou so much 🙂

Edited December 27, 20214 yr by kevinfirth