February 20, 20242 yr This feels almost counterintuitive to me... The demographically "trending older" audience of Avsim for instance, has, from my perspective over the years, often seemed to land somewhere between either neutral or even outright hostile to VR (bias on my part?) while seeming much more comfortable with older tech like trackIR. Anecdotally, my interactions with peer seniors show aversion to even trying something so new, though there are always exceptions. (like me!) So..... studies showing older folk enthusiastically accepting VR often strikes me as being a bit..... against my own personal experiences, and that tends to make me look for or suspect flaws/bias/sensationalism in the data....... 🤔 Not sure what to think https://fortune.com/2024/02/19/stanford-university-vr-study-seniors-eldery/ Edited February 20, 20242 yr by HiFlyer We are all connected..... To each other, biologically...... To the Earth, chemically...... To the rest of the Universe atomically. Devons rig Intel Core i5 13600K @ 5.1GHz / G.SKILL Trident Z5 RGB Series Ram 64GB / GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 4070 Ti GAMING OC 12G Graphics Card / Sound Blaster Z / Meta Quest 2 VR Headset / Klipsch® Promedia 2.1 Computer Speakers / ASUS ROG SWIFT PG279Q ‑ 27" IPS LED Monitor ‑ QHD / 1x Samsung SSD 850 EVO 500GB / 2x Samsung SSD 860 EVO 1TB / 1x Samsung - 970 EVO Plus 2TB NVMe / 1x Samsung 980 NVMe 1TB / 2 other regular hd's with up to 10 terabyte capacity / Windows 11 Pro 64-bit / Gigabyte Z790 Aorus Elite AX Motherboard LGA 1700 DDR5
March 3, 20242 yr On 2/20/2024 at 6:00 AM, HiFlyer said: This feels almost counterintuitive to me... The demographically "trending older" audience of Avsim for instance, has, from my perspective over the years, often seemed to land somewhere between either neutral or even outright hostile to VR (bias on my part?) while seeming much more comfortable with older tech like trackIR. Anecdotally, my interactions with peer seniors show aversion to even trying something so new, though there are always exceptions. (like me!) So..... studies showing older folk enthusiastically accepting VR often strikes me as being a bit..... against my own personal experiences, and that tends to make me look for or suspect flaws/bias/sensationalism in the data....... 🤔 Not sure what to think https://fortune.com/2024/02/19/stanford-university-vr-study-seniors-eldery/ I am 76 and I love VR. Not just for flight simming. I watch movies on it. It is to me like being at an IMAX. I have tried Skyrim, but I don't see a lot of positives over the standard game. JohnMy first SIM was a Link Trainer. My last was a T-6 IIAMD Ryzen 7 7800 X3D@ 5.1 GHz, 32 GB DDR5 RAM - 3 M2 Drives. 1 TB Boot, 2 TB Sim drive, 2 TB Add-on Drive, 6TB Backup data hard driveRTX 3080 10GB VRAM, Meta Quest 3 VR Headset
March 3, 20242 yr Author 1 hour ago, jmig said: I am 76 and I love VR. Not just for flight simming. I watch movies on it. It is to me like being at an IMAX. I have tried Skyrim, but I don't see a lot of positives over the standard game. And even I'm not so far in that I will watch more than the occasional (Mostly 3D) movie! As for Skyrim, the difference between the flat and Vr versions are pretty much nonexistent, so there's really no true upside to putting up with the sometimes uncomfortable headset, possibly for hours, just for pretty much the exact same experience as on a monitor. This changes dramatically with a sufficiently upgraded/modded Skyrim, on a computer that can handle the added visual complexity. Suddenly, you may feel you're actually inside a lush fantasy universe, and you might spend all your time thereafter gawping in astonishment at all of the details that draw you deeper than you've ever been into that universe..... Edited March 3, 20242 yr by HiFlyer We are all connected..... To each other, biologically...... To the Earth, chemically...... To the rest of the Universe atomically. Devons rig Intel Core i5 13600K @ 5.1GHz / G.SKILL Trident Z5 RGB Series Ram 64GB / GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 4070 Ti GAMING OC 12G Graphics Card / Sound Blaster Z / Meta Quest 2 VR Headset / Klipsch® Promedia 2.1 Computer Speakers / ASUS ROG SWIFT PG279Q ‑ 27" IPS LED Monitor ‑ QHD / 1x Samsung SSD 850 EVO 500GB / 2x Samsung SSD 860 EVO 1TB / 1x Samsung - 970 EVO Plus 2TB NVMe / 1x Samsung 980 NVMe 1TB / 2 other regular hd's with up to 10 terabyte capacity / Windows 11 Pro 64-bit / Gigabyte Z790 Aorus Elite AX Motherboard LGA 1700 DDR5
March 3, 20242 yr 54 minutes ago, HiFlyer said: And even I'm not so far in that I will watch more than the occasional (Mostly 3D) movie! As for Skyrim, the difference between the flat and Vr versions are pretty much nonexistent, so there's really no true upside to putting up with the sometimes uncomfortable headset, possibly for hours, just for pretty much the exact same experience as on a monitor. This changes dramatically with a sufficiently upgraded/modded Skyrim, on a computer that can handle the added visual complexity. Suddenly, you may feel you're actually inside a lush fantasy universe, and you might spend all your time thereafter gawping in astonishment at all of the details that draw you deeper than you've ever been into that universe..... Dang it, HiFlyer! Now, my wife is going be on my case for wasting time. 😉 JohnMy first SIM was a Link Trainer. My last was a T-6 IIAMD Ryzen 7 7800 X3D@ 5.1 GHz, 32 GB DDR5 RAM - 3 M2 Drives. 1 TB Boot, 2 TB Sim drive, 2 TB Add-on Drive, 6TB Backup data hard driveRTX 3080 10GB VRAM, Meta Quest 3 VR Headset
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.