December 31, 200718 yr I am using FSUIPC in FSX with my old partition of XP.However, I am also using 2 other instances of FSX, one in a new partition of XP PRO and the other in Vista 64. Those 2 do NOT have FSUIPC. Both have SP2 and ACCELERATION. I notice NO restriction and NO difference in performance whatsoever with my OLD FSX.Any thoughts?Abe
December 31, 200718 yr Author Forgot to add that I am getting much better FPS in the new XP PRO and Vista 64 without FSUIPC.
December 31, 200718 yr I have FSUIPC in FSX, but not the registered version. Ark -------------------------- I9 9900K @ 5ghz / 32GB G.Skill (Samsung B) / Aorus Master Mobo / EVGA GTX 2080Ti FTW 3
January 1, 200818 yr I don't have FSUIPC and see no reason why I should. I know someome has it because he uses it to assign various controls for various hardware (or something like that), but for normal use FSUIPC is not needed at all.
January 1, 200818 yr Some add-ons, not necessarily hardware related, require it to work. Some need it to work at all, others will have extra functionality when FSUIPC is installed.Daniel
January 1, 200818 yr >I am using FSUIPC in FSX with my old partition of XP.>>However, I am also using 2 other instances of FSX, one in a>new partition of XP PRO and the other in Vista 64. Those 2 do>NOT have FSUIPC. Both have SP2 and ACCELERATION. I notice NO>restriction and NO difference in performance whatsoever with>my OLD FSX.>>Any thoughts?>>AbeSo you're saying that FSUIPC doesn't affect performnace? I thought that was a given anyway.
January 1, 200818 yr My soul would be torn apart if I had to choose between Ultimate Terrain and FSMMovingMap. I might never find my way home from the Rockies without the FSUIPC link to the moving map; for me, at least, it's an essential for VFR touring...perhaps replacement utilities don't need it, but it's what I have relied on for several years now.Loyd Hooked since FS4... now flying: FSX Acceleration on Win7/64, Core Duo E8400; GA-EP45-DS3R; GTX 460-768MB; 4G RAM; Freezer 7 Pro
January 1, 200818 yr Author In NO way I am knocking down FSUIPC. As I mentioned earlier I am using it in FS9 and in my oldest FSX installation. I probably benefit from it quite a bit. What I am saying is this: in the other 2 instances of FSX, one in XP and the other in Vista 64, I do NOT have FSUIPC installed. It does not seem that I am losing any BENEFITS. Possibly because I am not using anything that is dependant on FSUIPC.I run a navigation program (XCONN) in conjunction with GPS and mapping programs like MAPPOINT and STREETS and also Flightsim Commander (limited) flawlessly. I am sure that some of you who responded would find FSUIPC invaluable and a MUST-HAVE. The reason I started this post is more out of curiosity than anything else. And I do appreciate all the responses.Thanks.Abe
Create an account or sign in to comment