Compared to MSFS, VR in FS24 is word not allowed.  Constant lags, pauses, and momentary screen to black.  Even in low density scenery.  Terrible.  And even on average settings, almost every startup gives the warning that the GPU resources are exceeded. My 4070 has 12GB so it shouldn't be overloaded with normal settings.

Luckily I still have MSFS installed and ready, I'm only going into FS24 for testing.  So much for all the reports of how good SU4 is for VR, including the VR Flightsim Guy, for me it's a disaster.

maybe some of your settings got changed somewhere. I'm using the Reverb G2 with 12Gb RTX 3060, and my flights are very smooth with no lags or pauses or black screens. And I fly a lot in the LA, California area. I do, occasionally, get the GPU resources warning, but usually only when I have a lot of AI traffic in view. I'd first look at your rolling cache. The last few times I installed a new beta, and again when SU4 became final, my rolling cache got reset to default. I usually have it set to 59GB. I can't remember if it was SU3 or SU4 that added extra settings for more control of your AI traffic as well, which can definitely affect your smoothness.

On 12/25/2025 at 11:22 AM, nojwod said:

Compared to MSFS, VR in FS24 is word not allowed.

word  "fantastic, much better than in FS2020" IS allowed, since in FS2024 we now have finally VR foveated rendering, which increased my fps by some 30% in VR. I 'm just another VR flightsim guy enjoying up to 52 fps in Pimax VR (much higher resolution than my previous HP Reverb). so it is not a general "MSFS 2024 is word not allowed"  😀