Ken Pryor

I am truly saddened to hear this Tom. I wish for peace and comfort for you and your family. Thank you so much for Avsim and everything else you've done for our community. The sim community is so much the better for your having been in it. Ken Pryor

Seriously considering the Cessna 310.

And we're back! I had already tried everything suggested except the jumper setting idea Jim mentioned. That did the trick! It's now back up and running. Thank you to all for your suggestions! Ken

Thanks guys, will do. Ken

Wow! That's impressive indeed. I will upgrade...eventually. Gotta save my pennies for a while.

So there I was, thinking how great it would be if I could tweak things just a little bit more to squeeze just a few more frames per second out of FSX and X-Plane. A little overclocking never hurt anyone, right? Yea... Made a little progress by upping the cpu clock speed, running my I7-920 up from 2.67 to 3.0 ghz. Was I satisfied at this point? Nope. Made a tiny adjustment on the memory voltage and now I got nothing. Can't even get to the post screen or bios. I'm hoping I can just swap out the ram and everything will work again, but if not I guess I'll be waiting until I can afford some replacement parts. Kicking myself, Ken

Wow! FS9 Evo is beautiful!

Dumb question...what is EVO?

I'm much the same way and find myself in FS9 much more than in FSX. I built my system in preparation for the release of FSX and found myself disappointed when the time came. Don't get me wrong, FSX has some very nice features and I do use it some, but not as much as FS9. I bought Active Sky Next and Rex Texture Direct when I started getting back into FS and they're great, but I'm wishing I had spent my money on Active Sky Evolution and Rex for FS9 instead. I'm currently using Active Sky 6.5 for FS9 and GE Pro. Ken

Thanks for the information! It's not really a problem, I just found it amusing. I took a 35 nm flight last night and it went very well, though I'll admit to not being impressed with the ATC. Not a real big deal though, but I do hope they'll make improvements to that part of the sim. I found the flight characteristics of the default 172 to be very good. I still need to optimize graphics for the best performance, but overall I'm very happy with X-Plane so far.

Both are excellent, thanks for the referral! Just took a quick test flight. Controls don't seem as difficult to configure as the UI would make it seem. I do have to laugh at the AI traffic and ATC a bit. My little hometown airport suddenly has tower controllers and 747's landing and taking off on the shortest of the two runways (about a 3500 foot rwy). The longest runway is only about a mile, so we don't see much (any) heavy traffic here IRL. Ken

Thanks, I'll give those a look. Ken

Flew around just a little with Jan's KRSV (thank you again) and took a short sight-seeing hop around my hometown. I definitely enjoyed the flight and look forward to a lot more time in XP. I did notice the download real-world weather isn't especially accurate. It's pouring down rain here, but that didn't show up in XP after I selected the download weather option. Overall, I'm impressed and look forward to many hours in the XP cockpit.

Wow! Thank you very much, Jan! That looks great! Ken Thanks for the link, Dave! I've watched some of his other videos and they're always good. Ken

Thanks Jan! My hometown airport is KRSV - Crawford County Airport near Robinson, Illinois. I'm really looking forward to learning XP and need to devote some time to reading up and watching video on it to help me get started. Ken