jon b

A very sensible post and approach. Perhaps also a lot of people don’t realise the amount of hardware and software issues real aircraft are released onto the market with. They have gone through thousands of hours of test flying and have been worked upon by a highly technical workforce probably numbering in the tens if not hundreds of thousands. The nearer our simulations get towards real aircraft in terms of systems depth it’s impossible to believe a development and testing team of 10 or 20 people, or even much less , are going to get a 100% accurate bug free replica out of the door. The best we can hope for is a stable foundation on which to build and improve on once it’s released to the market and many thousands of simmers then get eyes on it. To summarise, if Boeing and Airbus with all their resources and years of development don’t release a bug free product, it’s unrealistic to expect a team of 10 developers to release a 100% accurate replica of a highly complex aircraft in 18 months.

It looks and sounds good and it flies nicely. I just use it for short inter island flight in the Channel Islands as flown by Aurigny Although technically not the correct variant. It does everything I need from it and find it worth the price. There is as far as I know no other 228 on offer , there’s usually a carenado sale every so often if you want better value later on.

I think it’s next in line for Bluebird simulations after the 757, although probably not before 2030 if it takes a similar development path to their 757

You’re on the wrong vector, Victor.

A couple of technical notes on my technique for starting pistons engines in the sim are as follows : Using the right thumb apply a gentle continuous downward pressure on the CNTRL key, once you feel the key is at the bottom of its stroke , using the right index finger quickly jab the E key. The engine should start instantly without further intervention and both finger and thumb can then safely be removed from the keyboard area.

And just to add congratulations for being one of the extremely rare developers to actually include the visual circuit speed/power/config diagram in the manual. This is essential, it really annoys me that developers seem to think everyone is born with an innate ability to fly their aircraft with absolutely no speed or power references. Yes the theory is you find your own manual online but a lot of the time unless it’s a specific training manual it won’t have circuit or approach diagrams

I was just about to get the CJ simulations Typhoon in the just flight summer sale however I think I’ll save my pennies and put them towards this which is out next week,($45)…. if I can just hold on for another few days… AzurPoly - High-fidelity software for flight simulationDassault Rafale - AzurPolyThe first officially licensed Dassault Aviation Rafale C* for Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024, developed by AzurPoly in cooperation with JFEXP.

It’s not just an analog cockpit added on as an option is it, it’s a work of art in its own right. Very nice. I’m sort of glad the Got Friends Taylorcraft got delayed from its release today otherwise that would have been 3 hi fidelity GA add ons released 3 days in a row, I’m getting fatigued by it all.

Hahaha , I was leaning towards Malta

That’s exactly it 😂

Sure enough Polish 🧐🙂 thanks.

Really ? I was thinking Middle East.

I really don’t want failures and if I want a relaxing hour in the pattern I”ll fly a Carenado. However if an aircraft has failures available I’ll tend to leave them on as it adds an extra layer of realism for me and I’ll do what I’m supposed to do and keep an aye on the Ts & Ps etc. When failures firstbecame a thing in flight sim they were ridiculous and things were dropping off the aircraft every few minutes. I don’t want to see failures but just knowing they’re possible means I treat the aircraft a to more realistically. Sim routines in the. “ real “ world ( with some airlines) are also getting beyond a joke with the amount of failures. For example last year I had : approaching the airport just above minimum reserve fuel, overcast cloud at 500ft, ILS scheduled to be taken off the air for maintenance, a woman then collapsed in the rear galley, condition assessed as critical, I then lost both GPS. Then lost a main AC bus, Mayday called and got ILS maintenance cancelled , ATC deliberately kept high requiring GS intercept from above, followed by a 2nd AC bus failure. ( loosing 2 buses on a 4 bus all electric aeroplane like the 787 is a major issue.) All within a 30 minute window. Complete and utter negative training, if anything even resembling that had happened for real you’d be off work for years with PTSD

I’ve watched a few of his videos, I love his enthusiasm, and he’s always happy and chuckling🙂I’ve been wondering where he’s from I can’t quite place his accent.

The panel is out now I believe, I’m off to bed so will look tomorrow