Jump to content

Gumerson

Members
  • Posts

    174
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Donations

    0.00 USD 

Reputation

95 Good

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Flight Sim Profile

  • Commercial Member
    No
  • Online Flight Organization Membership
    none
  • Virtual Airlines
    No

Recent Profile Visitors

1,962 profile views
  1. I'm not talking about conlusion, just talking about facts, and is no the first time we talk about the same limitations together. Chaseplane is not userfriendly anymore at this state and this is not an opinion it's a fact. If msfs limit we can import a 737 to 738 you get back to original camera system where you can just copy camera.cfg to all variants and make little adjustment having the same shortcuts.
  2. Sorry, but the “24 groups” solution is simply wrong. From my experience, these groups must be created per profile, which defeats the purpose. Meanwhile, a far simpler solution would be to assign shortcuts by name. As a long-time and experienced user of the ChasePlane saga… do you know what finally happened to me? I got bored. The moment I realized I couldn’t import a 738 profile into a 737 one without breaking everything, I gave up. For those of us flying 3 to 6 variants of the same aircraft, redoing shortcuts and personalization for each one is just a waste of time. With AAO, my shortcuts work across all variants. I only need to customize the views, not reassign everything every time I switch planes. Result? I quit ChasePlane and MSFS altogether, and went back to MSFS2024. This is not the ChasePlane I once loved. Unfortunately, I have to admit: it was a bad investment on my part.
  3. For me it's been like a new install, community folder has been cleared completely. Fenix Installer it does not recognyzed MSFS 2024 installed. (edit) Just need to launch MSFS so Fenix can recognize it I'm having to reinstall or re-link (Contrail) everything
  4. I have the exact same number of subscribers as the YouTuber you’re recommending, so I ask myself: Do I know this addon? Yes. Have I been using it forever? Yes. Could I live without it in Prepar3D? No. Have I been dreaming since 2020 of finally seeing it in MSFS? Absolutely. Do I need a YouTuber’s opinion to decide whether to buy an addon? NEVER. And if I were just now discovering ChasePlane? Is there any YouTuber who speaks freely, with honesty, even at the cost of losing subscribers rather than betraying their true opinion? I answer myself: I only know one. After asking these questions, I buy the addon following my instinct. Because taking risks is what pilots do! P.S. Only Angels Have Wings!
  5. I'm thinking now maybe it would work, I will check it out in the maddog later.
  6. Thanks for considering bringing back the name assignment. I really appreciate it! As for SmartView, after testing it, I find it quite useful. Initially, I thought it was something else, but I see its value now. However, I might encounter a conflict when using it with aircraft like the Maddog MD-82 by Leonardo Fly, as QMDOS relies heavily on both right and left mouse buttons for various functions in the aircraft. This could lead to unintended interactions. Would it be possible to change the assignments so that SmartView can work without interfering with those functions? Regards
  7. **“Honestly, this new ChasePlane update is incredibly frustrating. In the previous version, we could assign camera views globally to the same buttons, and then simply adjust the specific angles for each aircraft. But now, for some reason, every single plane requires an entirely new button assignment from scratch. Who thought this was a good idea? Seriously, who wants to waste time reconfiguring controls for every aircraft when we already have a standard setup that works? This adds unnecessary complexity to something that was previously smooth and efficient. And don’t even get me started on SmartView being enabled by default. If I want to use it, I’ll turn it on myself. Forcing it on users is just bad design. Please, developers, reconsider this approach. The previous method was far more user-friendly. There’s no reason to make things harder for simmers who just want to fly without spending hours on control remapping.”**
  8. Just using the Inibuilds procedure seems to works pretty quite well. Atelic good job!
  9. I ran to orbx and bought it, but... grrrrr this msfs 2024 LPMA is not the Atelic one!
  10. I also got the gamepass for three months for just 21€ for this reason. This is like fsx, I remember developers promising free upgrades, me buying new versions and spending the rest of my time in fs2004 uninstalling fsx. I really enjoyed the test alpha version, fastest loading times, no ctds… But I’ve not been able to fly as I want with MSFS24 since release. Everytime I have a different problem, scenery stucked at loading in third party updated airport, same in some of the defaults one, Preflight in my fenix is ok but suddenly you got a ctd, no soul aircraft from inibuilds interest me at all, and now a ctd or stucked situation is enough for me to closing msfs24 and get my hardware out of my desk and just employ my time in other things.
  11. Why not to be clear? If they say native upgrade and free they could be more transparent and just say: Will be a version compatible for free and another optional "native" version. No more fees for me as a loyal old maddog customer so them. That is dissapointed, not the developers choice, the unclear post for we simmers employ our time speculating about fees or not upgrades fees. The only thing that is always pristine clear is my credit number card.
  12. In their page: "We’re excited to confirm that the Maddog X will be coming to FS2024 as a native upgrade and it's just behind the corner. Best of all, this upgrade will be provided free of charge to FS2020 Maddog customers". No fees them. cheers
  13. Oliver you are the best!
×
×
  • Create New...