Gumerson

I'm not talking about conlusion, just talking about facts, and is no the first time we talk about the same limitations together. Chaseplane is not userfriendly anymore at this state and this is not an opinion it's a fact. If msfs limit we can import a 737 to 738 you get back to original camera system where you can just copy camera.cfg to all variants and make little adjustment having the same shortcuts.

Sorry, but the “24 groups” solution is simply wrong. From my experience, these groups must be created per profile, which defeats the purpose. Meanwhile, a far simpler solution would be to assign shortcuts by name. As a long-time and experienced user of the ChasePlane saga… do you know what finally happened to me? I got bored. The moment I realized I couldn’t import a 738 profile into a 737 one without breaking everything, I gave up. For those of us flying 3 to 6 variants of the same aircraft, redoing shortcuts and personalization for each one is just a waste of time. With AAO, my shortcuts work across all variants. I only need to customize the views, not reassign everything every time I switch planes. Result? I quit ChasePlane and MSFS altogether, and went back to MSFS2024. This is not the ChasePlane I once loved. Unfortunately, I have to admit: it was a bad investment on my part.

For me it's been like a new install, community folder has been cleared completely. Fenix Installer it does not recognyzed MSFS 2024 installed. (edit) Just need to launch MSFS so Fenix can recognize it I'm having to reinstall or re-link (Contrail) everything

I have the exact same number of subscribers as the YouTuber you’re recommending, so I ask myself: Do I know this addon? Yes. Have I been using it forever? Yes. Could I live without it in Prepar3D? No. Have I been dreaming since 2020 of finally seeing it in MSFS? Absolutely. Do I need a YouTuber’s opinion to decide whether to buy an addon? NEVER. And if I were just now discovering ChasePlane? Is there any YouTuber who speaks freely, with honesty, even at the cost of losing subscribers rather than betraying their true opinion? I answer myself: I only know one. After asking these questions, I buy the addon following my instinct. Because taking risks is what pilots do! P.S. Only Angels Have Wings!

I'm thinking now maybe it would work, I will check it out in the maddog later.

Thanks for considering bringing back the name assignment. I really appreciate it! As for SmartView, after testing it, I find it quite useful. Initially, I thought it was something else, but I see its value now. However, I might encounter a conflict when using it with aircraft like the Maddog MD-82 by Leonardo Fly, as QMDOS relies heavily on both right and left mouse buttons for various functions in the aircraft. This could lead to unintended interactions. Would it be possible to change the assignments so that SmartView can work without interfering with those functions? Regards

**“Honestly, this new ChasePlane update is incredibly frustrating. In the previous version, we could assign camera views globally to the same buttons, and then simply adjust the specific angles for each aircraft. But now, for some reason, every single plane requires an entirely new button assignment from scratch. Who thought this was a good idea? Seriously, who wants to waste time reconfiguring controls for every aircraft when we already have a standard setup that works? This adds unnecessary complexity to something that was previously smooth and efficient. And don’t even get me started on SmartView being enabled by default. If I want to use it, I’ll turn it on myself. Forcing it on users is just bad design. Please, developers, reconsider this approach. The previous method was far more user-friendly. There’s no reason to make things harder for simmers who just want to fly without spending hours on control remapping.”**

83€ it’s crazy

Just using the Inibuilds procedure seems to works pretty quite well. Atelic good job!

I ran to orbx and bought it, but... grrrrr this msfs 2024 LPMA is not the Atelic one!

I also got the gamepass for three months for just 21€ for this reason. This is like fsx, I remember developers promising free upgrades, me buying new versions and spending the rest of my time in fs2004 uninstalling fsx. I really enjoyed the test alpha version, fastest loading times, no ctds… But I’ve not been able to fly as I want with MSFS24 since release. Everytime I have a different problem, scenery stucked at loading in third party updated airport, same in some of the defaults one, Preflight in my fenix is ok but suddenly you got a ctd, no soul aircraft from inibuilds interest me at all, and now a ctd or stucked situation is enough for me to closing msfs24 and get my hardware out of my desk and just employ my time in other things.

Why not to be clear? If they say native upgrade and free they could be more transparent and just say: Will be a version compatible for free and another optional "native" version. No more fees for me as a loyal old maddog customer so them. That is dissapointed, not the developers choice, the unclear post for we simmers employ our time speculating about fees or not upgrades fees. The only thing that is always pristine clear is my credit number card.

In their page: "We’re excited to confirm that the Maddog X will be coming to FS2024 as a native upgrade and it's just behind the corner. Best of all, this upgrade will be provided free of charge to FS2020 Maddog customers". No fees them. cheers

Oliver you are the best!

Agree at all.

Visual issues after covid 19 + hype and tinny fonts on my iphone explain my mistake. I have the entire collection for prepar3d msfs excepting the DC. This explained I got refunded immediately. but this post shows clearly the toxicity of todays community. sad

Do you guys want to laugh? I fell asleep watching a movie on my iPad, at about 4:00 p.m. I open my eyes, check the pmdg 777 page on my iPhone and I think I see that it is on sale for $69.99. I run to the computer, where I still had the triple 7 sale screen for $324.xxx F5 There are no changes I go back to my iPhone and think... It's the cache, because I buy it from the iPhone (where I see wrong with the smaller font) I go back to the PC, open my email, get the download link and the verification code. I download, and meanwhile, super sure of myself, I look at flightsim.to in case there is a new livery. I click on install and it appears: Repair Remove Reinstall and I say... wait a minute... I have bought the 737 800 again!!!!! Then I run to the bathroom mirror, look at myself... Indeed, I look like an word not allowed!!! ha ha ha pd Opened a ticket and got a refund uff!

Thank you all very much

You can scrub the red bar around the video and you will find the big true. If ASP3D is not depicting a sincle flat layer, and ASFS yes, witch one of the both hifisimtech products really works in a realistic maner?

Hi, There a pictures compared at the point you cross the cloud layer, but the appron pic its similar to the actual pic, the real life pic and there are not flat clouds in real world at this time, and meteoblue and competitors looks nicer, also Active Sky for P3D V5 looks great and no flat. 🙃

Do you mean that since I paid for my Active Sky FS license just yesterday, and for ASP3D V6, V5, V4, etc... If I am comparing the real sky image of LEMI with MSFS Meteoblue, with Rex Weather Force, with Xenviro2020 and, mind you, also with Active Sky P3D V5 (yes, I just added another image of the clouds generated by ASPD right away) and I have also verified the same with ASPD V6, and the only engine that is generating a horrible flat layer of clouds is ASFS... Should I wait, I don't know, please tell me, a month, or maybe 6 months, or maybe a year or even ten years better so as not to fall into the temptation of being too critical? Can you elaborate on why do you think a flat cloud layer is realistic when the real sky and five weather utilities or engines, two of them developed by Hifisimtech, do not generate flat clouds? I'm talking as I said before about VISUALS, and I got my eyes broken comparing reality with asfs visual depiction I believe in the truth, and the clouds that I see through my window in LEMI are the ones that rule this discussion, because those clouds were created by GOD. And to him and to the truth I surrender. All the best

Not much used to MSFS depicts clouds, I'm a Prepar3d flyer that can not live with the MSFS clouds depictions. I'm talking about flat clouds, only depicted by ASFS while comparing with actual real phisical true sky in the same place. Out of my window I have shot the real sky and I'm not seeing a flat low density single layer of clouds like are depicting in LEMI ASFS now. Regards and thank you for reading my post 😉

Same angle used already. And I'm taking screen shot of actual clouds in real place, so do not say that I'm talking about realism, I'm talking about visual, and this flat clouds generated by ASFS are not realistic too. I do not like the msfs cloud for the hyperdramtism look, for this reason I bouht it ASFS, but not for flat cartoonish cloud like that.

Minutes ago, around LEMI very very poor clouds at my taste with ASFS Real clouds around LEMI, ASFS CLOUDS, MSFS CLOUDS, XENVIRO2020 CLOUDS https://imgur.com/a/trghZnM Why these flat clouds, like in the first editions of ASP3D V.5? I had to deactivate Xenviro2020, I have bought every version ever made of Active Sky, I really want to love it but this cloud depiction are so poor... I got the screenshots minutes ago while live streaming If somebody wants to see the video PM, please. I'm not here for spaming my youtube channel. Regards

Thanks a lot!!