FlightSim1

Looks to be about 50/50 right now...interesting.

I have seen PMDG's work with the MD-11. Personally, I think they should take on the popular 717 model from Boeing as well. It represents that latest in short-haul technology (interestingly, since it is based on a 40-year-old design) and the latest in the DC-9 lineage. What does everybody else think?Obviously, this would have to happen after PMDG's current projects (737, 777, Dash-8), unless they shelved it do to a ridiculous turnout on this poll. BTW-this won't happen! Just checking to see how others feel about this, especially since the only decent 717 out there comes for Vans Aircraft Company. This company is a sister company to Sky Simulations; we all that PMDG's MD-11 trumps the Sky Sim version (which is pretty decent too) as well. If this is any indication of what PMDG could do with the 717, I say yes.Brennan

747 Classic package would be ideal, but I could go for a Boeing 717.Brennan

I would like to see PMDG leave the glass-cockpit arena and produce either:Lockheed TristarBoeing 747-100/200/300/SP ClassicBoeing 737-100/200 Classic

Thanks Bob, I'll try this.....................Brennan

I just recently began flying my TinMouse 737-200 again.......................I noticed two problems:1. The autopilot elevator pitch mode doesn't hold the airplane's attitude at time of engagement as it should - the airplane pitches down to nearly 30-40 degrees instead....................not good.2. The pressurization system - question - is there a way to reset the auto function after receiving an "off-scheduled descent" warning?The TinMouse is a great aircraft - probably the best on my simulator, but I do not remember encountering these problems...........I know it is something to do with my installation/something that has changed since I last used it (a while ago); not something I am doing (the 737 is like riding a bike - you never forget how to do it). Any help/expertise?Brennan

My vote is for the 777............I seem to be voting with the majority. :(

Hey guys,Does anybody have the V1.5 update anymore. I have V1.4, but need the final update. I would really appreciate any help - if anybody else needs anything let me know.Regards,Brennan

Graem B.,Thanks for the reply! My email is in your PM and below:pieronb1 at yahoo dot comI will let you know when I get them.Brennan

Thanks Jeff, I may take you up on that! I haven't come across anybody who has the files yet, so I will keep looking. If things get desperate, I'll get back to you. You are sure you don't have the actual complete set of computer files in the compressed folder? If not, that is fine, but I was just wondering. I will continue looking around, but if needed I am willing to pay postage to get the manuals. Thanks for the reply - looking forward to the new Jetstream 41 from PMDG!Brennan

If somebody could help me out, I would appreciate a reply. Help me out!

Could somebody help me out and send me the files for the 14 manuals that used to be on the SSW website that is now GONE. I had to reinstall Windows and these files are missing. I would really appreciate it if somebody who had them would help me out - thanks!Brennan

FS9 for everything. I mess around with FSX; it runs reasonably well on my mid-upper performance laptop computer. FSX just offers too low of performance levels for me to use it for any high-realism airline/GA simulator add-ons. I take the flying seriously, being a current real-world pilot, and FSX doesn't provide the performance for me. I wish it did, but at the same time, I have many add-ons for FS9 and would hate to not use them anymore, even though many of them are dual platform FS9/FSX aircraft add-ons.