mayday
Members-
Content Count
18 -
Donations
$0.00 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
AVSIM
Media Demo
Downloads
Gallery
Blogs
Forms
Everything posted by mayday
-
In my opinion UT2 is an unfinished program. It has a very large percentage of aircraft "generic" designed as "daedalus". The Developers preferred to sell the program and not finish it. Since several years ago that came to market. They already have enough time to have developed the missing textures. Another thing that bothers me is Shedule. The latest is the summer of 2012 and you have to pay. Instead of continuing to evolve and make new service packs, have returned to sell a "new ultimate traffic 2" called "2013" which is totally false. It's the same program without any innovation. And with the same Shedule of 2012 and unfinished painting a large percentage of aircraft. Despite all that, is the best program of Ai trafic until today. Instead of thinking about money, its creators should think of finishing it. Because technically it is a great program.
-
I have UT2. I tried the AI Traffic V3 Global few days ago. It seems very good. I think is the best free Ai traffic. It has routes and real flight plans like UT2. Even more updated. The aircraft design is much better than UT2. Actually I prefer it compared to UT2, who lacks hundreds of aircraft (Daedalus). But in busy airports have low frames, due to the excellent quality of their textures. I recommend it. Very few people know about this program and is better than everyone else. (sorry my English). J.Herrera
-
Understood. Thank you very much. Jorge H W7 64 Bit AMD phenom II X 6 4GHZ Nvidia 570 8 GB RAM Active Sky 2012 FS2Crew SimmSavvy Photoscenery USA FS GLOBAL Ultimate. Ultimate traffic 2
-
I have a doubt. When I decrease the FPS limits of displays (for example 10 or 15). I have the impression that I have more global frames on the VC. Is it true or just an illusion? Thanks Jorge H W7 64 Bit AMD phenom II X 6 4GHZ Nvidia 570 8 GB RAM Active Sky 2012 FS2Crew SimmSavvy Photoscenery USA FS GLOBAL Ultimate. Ultimate traffic 2
-
MUHA Terminal 3 (La HABANA - CUBA) MUHA-MUCU-MUHA MUHA-MPTO-MUHA MUHA-KMIA-MUHA Jorge H. Windows 7 64 AMD Phenom II X 6 4GHZ Nvidia 570 8GB RAM
-
Byork thank you very much.Paypal has blocked my account for years. I never paid through them.
-
The only way to pay is by paypal??Paypal always gives me trouble.I can not buy. I'm disappointed. I prefer to pay directly with Visa or MasterCard, as I do with other vendors.Jorge H.Windows 7 64bit.AMD phenom II (6) 1090T. 4.03 GHZNvidia 5708gb RAM
-
Please: Can anyone post the original configuration of colors?I forgot to backup. Now I have only cfg orange.Thanks for any help.Jorge H. Operating System: Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit (6.1, Build 7601) Service Pack 1Language: Spanish (Regional Setting: Spanish)Processor: AMD Phenom II X6 1090T Processor (6 CPUs), ~4.3GHzMemory: 8192MB RAMNvidia 570 GTX
-
Lose more than 5 frames and is unstable . Antilag for my spec is better.Jorge HWindows 7 ultimate 64AMD Phenom X6 1090T 4.3 Ghz8GB RAMNvidia 570
-
FPS with Overcast
mayday replied to ZachLW's topic in The AS16 and ASCA | Active Sky | Active Sky Next | XPAX Support Forum
Thanks Jim. I find no differences. Maybe 1024 32Bit offers slightly 1 or 2 frame. I'm not entirely sure. Also I see no difference in visual quality between 2048 DXT5 and 1024 32Bit. -
FPS with Overcast
mayday replied to ZachLW's topic in The AS16 and ASCA | Active Sky | Active Sky Next | XPAX Support Forum
I still have doubts. What configuration offers more fps? 2048 DXT5 or 1024 32Bit.Jorge HW7 Ultimate 64AMD Phenom (II) X6 1090T 4.3 GhzNvidia 570 -
TextureMaxLoad=30 and TEXTURE_MAX_LOAD=4096 are different things. Search google differences.You need both in the FSX.CFG.Jorge H.WINDOS 7 64 BIT.AMD phenom (II) X6 1090T 4.03 GHZNVIDIA 570.8GB RAM