![](https://www.avsim.com/uploads/set_resources_1/84c1e40ea0e759e3f1505eb1788ddf3c_flag_banner.png)
![](https://www.avsim.com/uploads/set_resources_1/84c1e40ea0e759e3f1505eb1788ddf3c_pattern.png)
StefanH75
Members-
Content Count
51 -
Donations
$0.00 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Ok, understood. I also didn't consider that the Garmin trainer is implemented in your simulation. However, it's quite uncomfortable if you use flightplanners with updated database and the GNS just doesn't find some of the waypoints. Nevertheless your GNS offers more immersion and fun than the default by XP
-
That's possibly a stupid question, as I am new to RealityXP: why isn't is possible to use the X-Plane implemented Nav database, respectively Navigraph or NavDataPro?
-
Maybe this plugin can be taken into consideration for the DC-6 once released: http://forums.x-plane.org/index.php?/forums/topic/106628-materials-ng-plugin-reflections-for-x-plane-1050/ I guess XP11 is still far away.
-
*thumbs up*
-
This is not a bug. It seems doppler effects are not modelled. I would appreciate if you would implement this in future updates.
-
Sure, it is all depending on hardware. But even if you have a high performance PC and increased the coverage range to the maximum, it is visible that the clouds end before the horizon. The coverage of default clouds is better, but the shape of the clouds is worse. Considering the service ceiling of the DC-6, you're going to be fine with SMP. Using jet airliners at e.g. FL330 may decrease the experience.
-
The coverage is limited and this visible at higher altitude, some people don't like it. For lower altiudes SMP is a perfect add-on. Just my humble opinion.
-
Skymaxx pro is a real eye-candy cloud enhancement. The best clouds shape for X-Plane. But has some disadvantages compared with default clouds or other cloud enhancement add-ons, especially on higher flight level. I recommend to compare to avoid any disappointment.