Dylanvessey88

no not in the control panel, but yes i have had re shade in the past but thought i deleted all the files

nope still there😕

Ah yeah sorry forgot to mention yes it is with nothing else like re shade running and I’ve already tried that with the same result unfortunately

Hi everyone, was messing around with some presets yesterday on P3DV4.2 and i can't quite remember but this red shade suddenly appeared which I can't get rid of. When i turn off HDR lighting it goes away so it has something to do with it. But I've tried turning all the HDR and post processing options off and back to default in PTA to no avail. Any ideas? https://drive.google.com/file/d/16g8HttfLm6Mz5i85sOet-K70KpmBY07U/view?usp=sharing https://drive.google.com/file/d/1tBXTqhevlxaRVeWn_qRiC0JsB_YOievC/view?usp=sharing

after doing some testing I've found out that it's actually the clouds casting shadows is the culprit, if I switch it off my frames go back up to 50fps! I guess i can just switch it back on once i reach land.

hello Damian, I've turned down my graphics card settings but there's not as many options for radeon as there is for Nvidia so it doesn't do much. I'll do some more testing like you said but I think it's just down to a particularly stormy day over the Atlantic.

Hi everyone, today i was flying EGLL - KMIA in the pmdg 777 and it was my first time using AS16 and ASCA. i was getting around 25fps at aerosoft heathrow and it was overcast. But as soon as i got near the clouds i was getting 5 - 10fps for the rest of the flight. I must admit it was very cloudy the whole flight but wasn't expecting to get that low frame rate. my specs are: i5 6600k 3.2-3.9 ghz 8gb ram radeon rx460 4gb. i'm only using 4 cloud layers with maximum coverage ( i tried high but no differnece) and 90 miles distance. (i also tried 60 miles but no difference) does anyone know how to improve this? thanks, Dylan

Hi everyone, It's my birthday coming up and I am getting a new pc and have found one which looks quite good: PALICOMP Gaming PC INTEL Skylake i5 6600K 3.5Ghz Turbo 3.9Ghz Quad Core - 8GB 2133Mhz Crucial Ballistix Sport - 1TB Sata3 HDD - NVIDIA GTX960 4GB - 1080p Gaming System - No OS - Sharkoon VG5-W Blue Case I'd like to run p3d with a lot of add ons and things while getting quite good fps, could this pc do that? This pc is also £600 which seems really cheap for the specs so could anyone please click on this link and make sure it's legit! https://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/aw/d/B01DUE3U7C?th=1&psc=1 Thanks a lot, Dylan

hope the problem has been resolved now!

Maybe verify integirty of game cache? That fixes missing and corrupt flies in fsx.

Hi Jake I've had the same issue before, and it was very frustrating! What fixed it for me was to lower your fsx settings, mainly the scenery settings, and limit your frame rates to which your computer can always sustain. Also, about your tweaked fsx.cfg, have you tried just using the default one as that could have something to do with it too.

Fixed it thanks to that guide, thank you very much

Hello, I've had the blackbox a340 and a330 for quite a while now and I use the virgin Atlantic liveries frequently. On the a333 there is the new livery but on the a346 there's only the, in my opinion, ugly and old one. I've had a look online but can't seem to find the new livery for the a346. Does anybody know if there is any new Virgin livery at all. Thanks, Dylan

thanks for that guide, it's very useful. I was just thinking in the program data folder it has all the scenery.cfg back ups in, I could try putting one of them into the fsx folder

I will try that now but I have never heard of 'program data' before, I'm using windows 7 and I can't seem to find it. Thanks

I Still get the same error unfortunately :(

Hi everybody, I recently downloaded a freeware Barbados add on for fsx se, I put it in the add on folder and launched up fsx, when it was loading it came up with 'FS cannot run without a valid scenery. Cfg, please uninstall and reinstall fsx' I deleted the freeware scenery, installed FSTscenery, which did nothing. I also validated the game cache. I then uninstalled and reinstalled fsx to no success. I've also tried replacing the scenery.cfg with the other one but still get the same error. The only thing that seems suspicious is that the first lines in the scenery.cfg is FS9 global. Which I don't have and I have fsx not fs9. I know this issue isn't rare but it's stopping me from flying. Any help would be deeply appreciated. Many thanks, Dylan

Could some at least post/ send me a link to a fresh terrain.cfg, that seemed to work for other people. The scenerys g tying annoying now

Hi Dan, Going through all the registries seems like quite a pain! And I haven't over clocked my computer but here are my specs anyway if this is any help: CPU: Intel® Core™ i5-4460 processor OS: Windows 8.1 Clock Frequency: 3.4GHz Graphic: Intel® HD Memory size: 4GB Memory Type: DDR3 1600 MHz Touch Screen: No Graphic details: Intel® HD Graphics 4600

yeah I've done a reinstall of all my ftx products but the problem persists!

hello, I assume this at an add on airport? if so an uninstall then re install normally does the trick. if that doesn't work it may be the aircraft's FMC database, have you updated the FMC at all? There just might not be any speed restrictions any more at that airport. cheers, Dylan

Hi everyone, I've had ftx global, vector and openlc Europe for a while now, and never had this issue but one day I went on FSX and I was on approach into Faro when i noticed there was auto gen scenery everywhere including the ocean! I can't remember if I did anything to cause this issue but I'm thinking it's something to do with orbx. so does anyone know how to solve this problem or could someone post a fresh terrain.cfg as I think mine is corrupt. many thanks, Dylan

Hello everyone, Recently I bought the wilco e190, and am quite surprised how good it is! But yesterday I updated the FMC database via navigraph (a bit late I know) and every time I programme the Approach in the FMC e.g. ILS 4L/VOR 4L I get things such as in LFMN: I 0 4L. Or R 0 4 L Y. I know this probably isn't a bug but could some one guide me to which one is the ILS approach etc. Cheers Dylan