Jump to content

Christian Bahr

  • Content Count

  • Donations

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

55 Good

1 Follower

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
  • Skype

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Location
    Dortmund, Germany
  • Interests
    Music, Flight Simulation

Flight Sim Profile

  • Commercial Member
  • Online Flight Organization Membership
  • Virtual Airlines

Recent Profile Visitors

929 profile views
  1. That's a very interesting video, I'm very impressed to see the Chevrolet under VR. Many thanks!
  2. Really, a very nicely done video. The possibilities in modern flight simulation are almost unlimited. Your video shows the ideas behind these possibilities in an impressive way.
  3. Depends on whether the Gauges are 32Bit DLL's. If so, it could cause the Gauges to remain fuzzy. The P3Dv4 is a 64 bit application, the P3Dv4 does not support 32 bit DLL's. Please correct if I am wrong. But the price for the linked add-on is not high, you hardly take any risk there 😉
  4. Hi! The problem with the sound could also be a problem with "User Rights". The place where you installed the P3D and the Chevrolet has special protection. This is due to Windows and can be solved by installing the Chevrolet in a different location that is not under "C:\Program Files". But either way. The Chevrolet will have problems with P3Dv4.4 because it has PBR material and PBR textures. P3Dv4.4 does not support PBR. Maybe the FSX version works in P3Dv4?
  5. Hmm, the Jeep looks familiar to me. But don't know who created it either. As far as I know there is the Jeep for the FSX, it should also work in the P3D? Best Regards Christian
  6. Hi! Do you have a current version of Prepar3Dv4 in use? The Chevrolet is based on P3Dv4.5 HF2.
  7. In terms of clarity, only a convertible is better. The first attempts to create a vehicle were made with a Cabrio Porsche Carrera GT. Unfortunately, the quality of the resolution of the textures and the details on the object is far from this. A brisk convertible would be interesting. It doesn't have to be a Porsche 🙂
  8. Hehehehe. A Mercedes? No way! Then more like a Tesla vehicle or an Audi. I am an Audi fan 🙂 To you, Gustav, and everyone else, a happy new year Christian
  9. That is wrong. I didn't work for Aerosoft. I published a scenery on Aerosoft. There is a big difference. No, there is no conflict of interest 🙂 No, it says who the developers of the scenery are 😉
  10. There is no conflict of interest, I can rule that out. It would be different if I had worked on the Aerosoft Airbus. I have not. But I would have been very proud of that 🙂 I am not a "Commercial Member"! Someone changed the label. Wonder who is responsible for that? I am a freeware developer and operate flight simulation as a hobby and I secure my livelihood through my job at my employer 🙂
  11. That's not exactly correct. It has to be called: Freeware Simwings/Aerosoft Airport Avatars You also forgot to mention the Bahrometrix download page: Bahrometrix Downloads You can only recommend everyone to have a look there 🙂
  12. Perhaps @Urmel81 tells us which AI traffic he uses from which manufacturer !?
  13. With all due respect! Do we want to have such a discussion? So the level has dropped significantly with the last post ... sounds almost like one of the many conspiracy theories circulating on the web 🙂 ...
  14. Lol Now it's getting fun 😂 The hand that feeds me should be Aerosoft? 😂😂😂
  • Create New...