Jump to content

blueshark747

Members
  • Content Count

    2,434
  • Donations

    $0.00 
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

1,958 Excellent

About blueshark747

  • Rank
    Member - 2,000+

Flight Sim Profile

  • Commercial Member
    No
  • Online Flight Organization Membership
    Other
  • Virtual Airlines
    No

Recent Profile Visitors

3,970 profile views
  1. What does this have to do with MSFS? It should be posted in https://www.avsim.com/forums/forum/120-hangar-chat/
  2. Gosh....plz plz plz be optimized well enough for VR performance pleeease!!
  3. I drive down here...WE ARE NOT THERE YET!🤣 *Photogrammetry OFF*
  4. Photogrammetry takes all but under a minute from off to on and vice versa....quit your crying already or just go fly IRL at this point. Current photogrammetry tech is only meant to look convincing from 5-10k+ feet up.
  5. Brazil and Argentina get the absolute shaft with electronics import inflation $$$.
  6. Yea def let me know! Especially concerning the pupil swim I hear about. I'm still enjoying my Rift S but I plan on buying a Pico Neo3 Link as well just because they are cheap and why not.
  7. From what I hear, you've made a great choice! I hear the Neo 3 visuals are great using Display Port.
  8. A must buy as long as the low performance tax claim stands true!
  9. I remember buying the Alabeo C400 Corvalis TT for FSX and being extremely disappointed in how the product sounded and performed.🤬🤣
  10. Besides the Carenado PC-12 being visually stunning, I've been pretty satisfied with the Carenado improvements for it to satisfy my PC-12 needs. I don't feel the need to buy another PC-12 atm.
  11. I'm over these tandem two seater single engine types personally...we have enough of them in MSFS already. IRIS Simulations Pilatus PC–21 AzurPoly Socata TB–30 Epsilon RPSimulations Embraer EMB 312 Tucano
  12. Active Sky adds another sense and feeling of atmospheric depth to the visuals of the sim especially in VR . I can't fly without it now.
  13. I don't see any real performance loss at all and I'm in VR where the performance tax straw can break the camel's back.
  14. Ok now I do recall the Mustang's avionics displays eating a ton of performance in FSX and thinking why does this thing eat so much FPS with such lackluster visuals?🤷‍♂️ Flysimware have been pretty consistent with the L35A, it flies great in MSFS as well as much more modernized updated visuals from the new sim engine than FSX. I really wish Lionheart Creations focused on bringing the Epic Victory VLJ to MSFS over that LearFan 2200, Tobago or Dragonfly. Even though I'd much rather have Aerobask's Epic Victory Jet in MSFS, but never gonna happen apparently.
×
×
  • Create New...