arsenal82

Waters (all kind) forests in msfs are just an ai guess; those were far more precise using older simulators as fsx or p3d where far more precise data could be used in the sim even for large areas; and as already mentioned; corrections of areas do take very long time to build; it is all hand made; point by point in most of those patches.

One of the worst forum ever created for FS; Ms would be better off shutting it down for good.

interesting; I empty community folder and loading time far better than with addon in it.

You are absolutely right. With some addons installed there is no difference; tested others; load time increase; longer than before the update. Seem like some addons have more impact than others.

After last update loading time have increased; that is what debated here. Exactly same installation from 2 mins to 5 mins; simmers wonder why. Having said that; some addons might affect loading time more than others; is up to what asobo actually change / break. 😁

@PipsPriller, Interesting project; look well planned too. It would also be very useful for vfr of a version of how it look in present days.

and ctd

The morphing fix do more than just 'adjust' morphing around coastlines. It includes editing of sea water along south west shores; northern shores; north east shores where water cliffs climbing is widespread. Default mesh do not really show water cliffs climbing but it morph; mesh addons might well introduce water climbing; the morph fix help in both situations as to block / mitigate this kind of problems. Having said that; it is a huge task to get into every single corner; not because of the lenght of coastlines; but for the fact that the sdk is not really designed to handle vertical polygons; with a distorted perspective of the area edited; to fix this kind of defects precision is required.

it varies; lidar dtm is been mostly completed non long ago; however asobo been added high res mesh to British Isles for quite some time as the lidar data become available. All south of England is high res mesh; a 1 m or 2 m; this is screen taken over the Portland Bill in Dorset; is on a 1 or 2 m resolution by default.

less mesh resolution = less morphing more mesh resolution = more morphing

Default Norway mesh morphing like a jojo. Norway 15 m mesh; yes less resolution than default now-days; but avoiding terrible morphing effects; to be honest rather have less resolution than a bouncing terrain fest.

This sim can be a problems fest for some and not for others. Is only about luck; once it goes wrong you had it.

The tool is already available; in form of msfs sdk. Very likely they choice the route of 'fancy stuff' animated creatures; however it come with limitations as frames rates and loading time take its tool if over done. The other route is a more straight forward direction; static with more animals and less objects polygons.

Another that like me. Is an avsim forum love affair I think.

bit of a long post to follow; but let me put across a couple important points; I am not here to sell anything; I am just here to ask question about the work I do; some might like some do not; fine for me; but no misinformation; and yes the videos are up to show what a scenery is; than is up to you to decide. My vision is simple and straight forward and San Francisco is an example; I write in the forum and also clearly San Francisco show is not pbr; and come here and say again; SF do not feature pbr textures; if you like pbr exclusively than is not for you. Again; I am not here to sell anything; I am here to try stop misinformation; and to be clear; the majority of simmers enjoy the work done at my end. That is good enough for me; of course a minority can be more demanding in addons and I perfectly understand; you do not like ? Nobody force you to buy it; but do not stop with misinformation others that might enjoy it. Subpar or not subpar like many others work out there some better than others from major addons companies; either sold in their shops or marketplace; bought also by myself some good some not good; however I am not going around forums starting telenovelas about a scenery or accusing anybody of anything. the rule here is: you need it ? you want it ? get it is not for you: move on Adding too much fancy stuff to scenery as the sim is underperforming due to a bug introduced 5 month ago and with the possibility of more bumps on the roads; not good advice; there is enough waste ware works out there; and yes some are even still on sale. ray