AnkH
Members-
Content Count
3,412 -
Donations
$0.00 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Community Reputation
2,192 ExcellentAbout AnkH
-
Rank
Member - 3,000+
Profile Information
-
Gender
Male
Flight Sim Profile
-
Commercial Member
No
-
Online Flight Organization Membership
none
-
Virtual Airlines
No
-
How to get the best image quality using DLDSR+DLSS
AnkH replied to Cpt_Piett's topic in Microsoft Flight Simulator (2020)
For DLSS Ultra Quality you need nVIDIA Profile Inspector, because the Control Panel does not offer this setting. But does the novel nVIDIA App offer it? Anyone knows this? -
Thanks for the comparison shots, as I expected, the difference is marginal if not using the switching back and forth of both screenshots allowing to actually see the difference. I would even claim that you wont notice the difference when not using screenshots and flying around between LOD 400 and LOD 600. Or: if I show you a video WITHOUT any chance to do a comparison, you would not be able to tell the LOD as soon as it is above 400. For me, reason enough not to bother that much about settings higher than 400. But that is my personal opinion 😉
-
I will do some tests on my side, but as a matter of fact: yes, with a side by side comparison, you will be able to judge if the mountain tops are defined and "sharp" in the distance, but when you are not comparing, I doubt that you will notice if the mountain at the horizon is rounded because of the lower LOD or because of the simple fact that it actually is rounded also in RL. Unless you know the terrain very good because it is your hometown/region, of course. Swiss Alps will be my playground, because I exactly know how the panorama should look like e.g. when sitting on the tarmac in LSZB. But if I am flying e.g. in NZ, I am not familiar enough with the mountain shapes I could potentially judge if the panorama looks right when sitting in Queenstown.
-
Do you really see a difference when sitting on ground using that high TLOD and OLOD values compared to "normal" ones like TLOD and OLOD at 200?
-
Even with the AutoFPS app?
-
The question is: do you really still need the framerate lock if you are able to get more than those 30 FPS when using the AutoFPS tool? Back in P3D, I only locked my frame rate because my rig was not capable of achieving much more and it helped to stabilize the FPS. But nowadays, using frame generation and MSFS, I have my FPS unlocked and thanks to AutoFPS, the framerate anyway never dips into a region critical, e.g. for my G-Sync to be disabled (running from 48FPS upwards).
-
You must be fun at parties...
-
And the plane worked normally afterwards? In my case, the plane did not work anymore after restarting the Fenix app...
-
Sadly no word on the sinking into ground issue I have with B2 on almost every second gate...
-
Censorship in official MSFS forums
AnkH replied to AnkH's topic in Microsoft Flight Simulator (2020)
The error many companies do, instead of getting true customer feedback, they have a forum full of white-washed yaysayer stuff. As soon as you criticise, your stuff gets removed, so if (!) Asobo Devs really rely on feedback from the forums, it would explain why some stuff never improves. Sometimes truth needs to hurt and if you deliver rubbish, it is important that at least one persons is able to tell you so. Otherwise you will never improve. But I am aware that this is a mindset many people do not like nowadays, they rather prefer the "no-harm approach" instead of clear cut words. -
Censorship in official MSFS forums
AnkH replied to AnkH's topic in Microsoft Flight Simulator (2020)
Those forums are a full joke the longer you think about it. No tools making the sim better like the AutoFPS tool are allowed being mentioned (not even in PM), in Bug threads moderators continue to teach contributors about that bug threads are not meant for discussion, if you have a thread with votes, you are not allowed to link to this thread from another one dealing about the same topic, and and and. The main aim of those forums is to have a bunch of yaysayers praising the product. End of the story. And to calm down the naive ones with stupid stuff like "bug logged" or "feedback logged" tags pretending that devs are working on certain bugs. If they do, nice, but do not expect feedback and if you do, be prepared that the "community" flags your post. Ridiculous, just straight ridiculous. Only thing that drives me more nuts is the hard-coded smile in Jorgs face during Q&A sessions. -
6700k 1080 16GB RAM + Fenix/PMDG - a world of pain?
AnkH replied to VHOJT's topic in Microsoft Flight Simulator (2020)
Screenshots or it doesnt happen 🤣 -
6700k 1080 16GB RAM + Fenix/PMDG - a world of pain?
AnkH replied to VHOJT's topic in Microsoft Flight Simulator (2020)
People forget that those sliders and settings actually have a function and an effect, there are settings other than high or ultra. Pretty sure you can get reasonable FPS when putting everything on low and TLOD down to 50 using this hardware. Whether or not this then still looks acceptable or not is a whole different story though... -
How to wreck performance in MSFS with a decent rig
AnkH replied to Cpt_Piett's topic in Microsoft Flight Simulator (2020)
Oh no, plz, not again this «a human eye can only see 30Hz» bull... it is wrong in so many aspects it hurts reading this over and over again... -
Airport parked at gate sinks into the ground?
AnkH replied to captain420's topic in Microsoft Flight Simulator (2020)
It does indeed fix it... for some time, then it reappears. What sadly does not work is re-login while sitting at the gate. While the sinking is eliminated, the whole plane is then in an unusable state with switches not working etc. Doing it while being in the main menue works at least.