ark4diusz

Had longer brake for Flight Sim. I have noticed that Active Sky pushed few updates since the release. What is general consensus between Active Sky vs Default weather? Which one to choose?

It should be noted that its alternative to Navigraph Charts not Navigraph itself - it contains only charts services for now it seems

The direct answer to OP question in topic can be found on FAQ section for BATC and SayIntenstions: BATC: Is BeyondATC powered by AI? We use the latest in AI technologies to process your voice, decide what the ATC should do, and generate highly realistic responses with AI voices. However, to keep the program affordable we do not use a LLM (Large Language Model) such as Gemini or ChatGPT. SayIntensions: How much does it cost? Why do you have to charge a subscription fee? $29.95/mo or $295 for a year. However, the price of AI services drops every few months, and we will pass those savings on to you when it happens. Because we're using modern, cutting-edge AI services, neural networks, insanely authentic voices, and machine learning, costs are incurred every time you communicate with ATC. Any ATC service that offers their product for a one-time fee isn't using AI. Don't be fooled by claims to the contrary.

Just A340-300

Taking into account that AI services are not cheap (for now), we should not blame SayIntensions for the price they set. 2 quotes from FAQ: How much does it cost? $29.95/mo or $295 for a year. However, the price of AI services drops every few months, and we will pass those savings on to you when it happens. Why do you have to charge a subscription fee? Because we're using modern, cutting-edge AI services, neural networks, insanely authentic voices, and machine learning, costs are incurred every time you communicate with ATC. Any ATC service that offers their product for a one-time fee isn't using AI. Don't be fooled by claims to the contrary.

Had small break from the flight sim - what is general consensus regarding the FBW A32X vs iniBuilds A32X? Which one offers more "immersive" experience right now in terms of system depth, textures, sounds, integrations - etc. - overall experience? Thank you

I do not follow the development info / threads on BATC Discord. Have one question, is there any indication regarding the traffic injection feature implementation timeline? Is 2024 release achievable, or should we expect 2025? Is there any rough estimate?

Following topic, what is the difference in VSYNC option in NVCP between ON and FAST?

From the post by Martyn from JustFlight on Reddit:

Don't you all think, we are approaching the best "time" for MSFS in terms of incoming Airliners that should be released in the near future? I mean: iniBuilds A320 Neo this month PMDG 777 ~up to 2 months TFDi MD-11 ~2-3 months iniBuilds A350 ~I guess up to 6 months Bluebird 757 somewhere in 2024 FlyByWire A380 somwehere in 2024 Just Flight BAE Avro RJ Just Flight Fokker 70/100 Aerosoft A330 Do not know if I forgot something? Anyways, great times ahead in the next 3-6 months

Hello, I am giving a shot for this app thank you Reset XPDR for the tremendeous work. Its difficult to read all thread, so have one question. What target FPS / Auto target FPS should I use in app if I have RTX 4080 (so native frame generation) and G-SYNC ultimate 144 Hz monitor?

It seems that SayIntensions.AI now supports also the IFR procedures - please see Q8Pilot Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T65gSECBWxk Also per FAQ page: https://sayintentions.ai/faq/

Following a thorough evaluation of the project, we have decided to shift the development and release of the A330 around the upcoming Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024. This will allow us to greatly expand the focus of the project – including multiple engine options. Additionally, both the CEO and NEO variants of the A330 will be released simultaneously. Once we have more details to share, we will update you via this page. Source: https://a330.aerosoft.com/updates.php?fbclid=IwAR0F1mJ4SfTJPSFPLESoIUk5k3KZ7oZi_N54BLCD1zmXfU2z6Js7-diXPVc#dev-updates

If the MSFS market is x2 / x5 / x100 / x1000 larger for PMDG, why PMDG (with +30 years of experience in Flight sim) cannot put more resources to work on different projects simultenously? After all PMDG is the most experienced exisitng flight sim company - they definitievely have resources and know how to develop and publish new aircrafts quicker than competition (with high quality). Right now it looks like this: "We cannot full focus on 777/747 until all NG variants are released". After 737 NG released: "Ohh, we will full focus on 777/747 when UFT will be released". If the market is that attractive and demand for good aircraft is huge (747/777) I will put much more resources to hire good programmers and create indpendent teams to release 747/777 as quick as possible to earn more and more $$$ I just do not get it

Wow, that's hella expensive. Here in Poland for 1 GB fiber we pay at most ~25 USD/month