Jump to content

leprechaunlive

Members
  • Content Count

    712
  • Donations

    $0.00 
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by leprechaunlive

  1. Dont think so to be honest. I think Carenado is not following all new guidelines from the new SDK and are trying to reuse their old codes as much as possible.
  2. Shouldnt have used so much legacy codes then...Its weird how the default aircrafts NEVER break (CTDs i mean) after updates. Next aircraft, do it from scratch natively. Lets see if it still takes you 4 weeks to make as opposed to many many months.
  3. This is @Steve Dra for you. Known to go overboard with the screenshots, youtube video, names, 1000 words back stories, etc. πŸ˜‚ But thats part of the charm πŸ˜„ we need more Steves. Full on dedicated to the hobby, and to this forum.
  4. Oh im CERTAIN that in there contract they have a line saying that Carenado MSFS products can solely be sold via the MS marketplace. Makes sense, its probably the dev that sells the most, so that means more comission dollars for MS. TChing tching!
  5. Exactly right, its at least careless from Carenado and or MS to let the product there, or, depending wich way you look at it, its borderline dishonest. But more importantly, im pretty sure it could be seen as illegal too
  6. @Steve Dra We been concerned for many weeks, me and others, that broken products can still be sold, without any warnong of any kinds. Now we are lucky we have avsim and this communitt. But the massive amount of new players msfs brought, have no clue about carenado, about their history, about updates that mighr have broken something or other. I feel sorry for them, they spent good money on a new shiny plane just to get CTD. Whereas me when that happened i was like "well, at least it worked longer than i thought it would" πŸ˜…
  7. Dude im even worse than that. Im French, but i lived a long time in Ireland πŸ˜„
  8. LOL. If it went that far, im pretty sure piracy is not the only thing to blame here...
  9. hehe dont worry, it doesnt take away the beauty of them πŸ˜„
  10. BTW @Steve Dra, are you ill or feeling unwell? Leaving this devmode toolbar up there is SOOOO NOT you πŸ˜„
  11. That would NOT surprise me πŸ™‚ You can tell looking at the files that they didnt really follow the native SDK, they reused as much "old" stuff as possible.
  12. Actually the sim mechanics are very very similar than the previous ones. The 3d model will be all new (even if they could take their old one as a base) but the rest will try to reuse as much of the old cfgs and codes. Thats what i would do anyway
  13. So the changelog was from the previous update? Because it says "invisible spoiler removed on the cessna 208B". so i guess it was fixed with patch 7.....but actually NO. The cfg entry is still there.
  14. The beast is tamed! After 3 days of the floats sending me into the stratosphere, i finally found a good set of contact points. First major advancements! Next, probably refine the 3D, and get to texturing.
  15. Yes, ive had a few of the early Thalixte stuff, it was for my little PC, just way way too much to handle. Then he introduced a very agressive optimization process that cut the textures count by A LOT, but it was still a little too big for my CPU and RAM. But you'r right, he's one of the best out there.
  16. exactly. I use plenty of airport freeware scenery, but the cities pulled of google, eyhmm, no thanks, it looks usually bad, and it murders my fps.
  17. @kaosfere @cavaricooper How's the behavior of the float version? (on water i mean)
  18. Thats right. People are begging for a fix, but they are NOT ready for the things this new patch will break πŸ˜„
  19. Its on the LiveryMegaPack discord channel somewhere, but i cant find the link right now. Try google πŸ™‚
Γ—
Γ—
  • Create New...