Jump to content

julietsierra46

Members
  • Content Count

    9
  • Donations

    $0.00 
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

5 Neutral

Flight Sim Profile

  • Commercial Member
    No
  • Online Flight Organization Membership
    none
  • Virtual Airlines
    No

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. And im very thankful for people like yourself that do this kind of work. I might be jumping the gun with my response there, I just really hope they allow modifications of buildings and their placement in the future. JS
  2. This is all they are going to allow the community to do? There are so many problems on default airports all over the world regarding buildings and building placement and they wont let us fix it? What a dissapointment, what a wasted opportunity, geeeezz.
  3. This is the modular throttle I have been waiting for for a long time. Then they go on and decide to add the jetliner series thrust levers to the basic Kickstarter which I am funding. Absolutely brilliant, well done.
  4. Does anyone have these nice trees blocking their view after the runway lights fix, also in cockpit and every other view lol.https://imgur.com/a/PHynTWD
  5. Hi folks, new to this program and just getting into it, really looks good and I think I am going to enjoy it. Just one question, my goto airport is BIKF Keflavik, I noticed that there´s a large section of missing apron east of the main terminal when I realized p2a wouldn´t let me choose the right "gate". I think the the current info, at least as far as that particular piece of apron is concerned, is about 10 years old acc. to the sat pic in the program. Do you request the developer to look into it or is there a "do it yourself" way of modifying airports? Thanks for any answers. John
  6. Interesting, thanks for the heads up! Mixture isn´t well modelled true, maybe were in for an update sometime in the future in that regard. Not that default aircraft worry me much anyways, the future is in aircraft add ons and I´m sure better mixture physics are on the list. Cheers. JS edit; clarification
  7. I get your meaning, it the asobo 172 seems work very well. But I just took it to 1500 feet and started to cut the mixture. Went all the way to 5% mixture and no rpm drop. Wonder if the a2a under the hood simulation may be superior to asobos approach....maybe not.
×
×
  • Create New...